On giovedì 21 aprile 2022 21:52:14 CEST Fabio M. De Francesco wrote:
> On giovedì 21 aprile 2022 21:20:26 CEST Jaehee Park wrote:
> > Remove braces for single statement block to minimize the number of
> > empty lines, without loss of readability. Issue found with checkpatch.
> > WARNING: braces {} are not necessary for single statement blocks
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Jaehee Park <jhpark1013@xxxxxxxxx>
> > ---
> > drivers/staging/r8188eu/core/rtw_mlme.c | 3 +--
> > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/staging/r8188eu/core/rtw_mlme.c b/drivers/staging/
> r8188eu/core/rtw_mlme.c
> > index 3e9882f89f76..d3f4d7cdfa08 100644
> > --- a/drivers/staging/r8188eu/core/rtw_mlme.c
> > +++ b/drivers/staging/r8188eu/core/rtw_mlme.c
> > @@ -112,9 +112,8 @@ void _rtw_free_mlme_priv(struct mlme_priv
*pmlmepriv)
> >
> > rtw_free_mlme_priv_ie_data(pmlmepriv);
> >
> > - if (pmlmepriv) {
> > + if (pmlmepriv)
> > vfree(pmlmepriv->free_bss_buf);
> > - }
> >
> > }
> >
> > --
> > 2.25.1
> >
>
> Hi Jaehee,
>
> If you just want to remove the braces, your patch is good.
>
> But... Did you ask yourself why this code needs to test if "pmlmepriv" is
> valid before calling vfree() on it? Actually, the code doesn't need this
> test, it just needs to call "vfree(pmlmepriv)" unconditionally.
When copy-pasting I overlooked a couple of things... However the argument
is the same: the code doesn't need that 'if' statement before vfree().
I wanted to write "[] it just needs to call "vfree(pmlmepriv-
>free_bss_buf)" unconditionally".
I apologize for not reading twice before sending my email too soon after
writing and moving sentences around.
> OK, I know that this is not directly related to your patch or any other
> that is explicitly made just for removing unnecessary braces...
"pmlmepriv" is valid because we know it from the previous call to
rtw_free_mlme_priv_ie_data(). Therefore the code can dereference
"pmlmepriv".
Furthermore, even if "free_bss_buf" were NULL it wouldn't matter because
"vfree(pmlmepriv->free_bss_buf)" would be a no-op.
Sorry if this inaccurate wording might have confused you about what I was
trying to say.
Thanks,
Fabio
