On Fri, Apr 15, 2022 at 05:47:05PM +0800, Wang Cheng wrote: > > > diff --git a/drivers/staging/rtl8712/usb_ops_linux.c b/drivers/staging/rtl8712/usb_ops_linux.c > > > index f984a5ab2c6f..e321ca4453ca 100644 > > > --- a/drivers/staging/rtl8712/usb_ops_linux.c > > > +++ b/drivers/staging/rtl8712/usb_ops_linux.c > > > @@ -495,12 +495,14 @@ int r8712_usbctrl_vendorreq(struct intf_priv *pintfpriv, u8 request, u16 value, > > > } > > > status = usb_control_msg(udev, pipe, request, reqtype, value, index, > > > pIo_buf, len, 500); > > > - if (status > 0) { /* Success this control transfer. */ > > > - if (requesttype == 0x01) { > > > - /* For Control read transfer, we have to copy the read > > > - * data from pIo_buf to pdata. > > > - */ > > > - memcpy(pdata, pIo_buf, status); > > > + /* For Control read transfer, copy the read data from pIo_buf to pdata > > > + * when control transfer success; otherwise init *pdata with 0. > > > + */ > > > + if (requesttype == 0x01) { > > > + if (status > 0) > > > + memcpy(pdata, pIo_buf, status); > > > + else > > > + *(u32 *)pdata = 0; > > > } > > > > This isn't really correct. In many cases status is "len" is less than 4. > > I'm slightly surprised that nothing complains about that as an > > uninitialized access. But then another problem is that "status" can be > > less than "len". > > Sorry, I should explain it clearly. If I did right, watching "status" > with gdb while running syzkaller reproducer, "status" returns from > usb_control_msg() is -71. In which case, *pdata won't be touched in > r8712_usbctrl_vendorreq(). As a result, "data" in > usb_read8()/usb_read16()/usb_read32() will be returned without > initialization. I think that is why kmsan reports: > Local variable data created at: > usb_read8+0x5d/0x130 drivers/staging/rtl8712/usb_ops.c:33 > r8712_read8+0xa5/0xd0 drivers/staging/rtl8712/rtl8712_io.c:29 > > > > > A better fix instead of setting pdata to zero would be to add error > > checking in the callers and then change this code to use > > usb_control_msg_send/recv(). Probably just initialize "data" in the > > callers as well. > > I tried something similar which also works fine, but I think this patch > does't fix it at root. > https://syzkaller.appspot.com/text?tag=Patch&x=15be2970f00000 Oh... I meant initialize data on the success path as well. __le32 data = 0; You're saying that kasan generates a warning for your updated patch? Earlier I mentioned "I'm slightly surprised that nothing complains about that as an uninitialized access." so I guess maybe it does complain? Good. regards, dan carpenter