On Tue, Apr 5, 2022 at 11:19 AM Sevinj Aghayeva <sevinj.aghayeva@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > On Tue, Apr 5, 2022 at 11:17 AM Greg Kroah-Hartman > <gregkh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > > On Tue, Apr 05, 2022 at 11:09:12AM -0400, Sevinj Aghayeva wrote: > > > Adhere to Linux kernel coding style. > > > > > > Reported by checkpatch: > > > > > > WARNING: suspect code indent for conditional statements > > > > You are also removing unneeded comments, right? Please explain that as > > the documentation link the bot pointed you to showed. > > I specified that under the --- line: > > v1 -> v2: Remove the comments that became irrelevant with proper indentation. I think I misunderstood the bot's response. It looks like you triggered it because you wanted me to write a more complete description of what the commit is doing. I thought I received it because it was the second version of the patch from a previous patchset (the last bullet point in the bot response) that didn't include v2 in the subject and a v1 -> v2 after the --- line. I can do a fresh patch with a complete description and no v2 stuff; please let me know. Thanks > > > > > thanks, > > > > greg k-h > > > > -- > > Sevinj.Aghayeva -- Sevinj.Aghayeva
