Thus wrote Fabio M. De Francesco (fmdefrancesco@xxxxxxxxx): > > > pnpi = netdev_priv(netdev); > > > if (!pnpi->priv) > > > - goto RETURN; > > > + return; > I cannot see how pnpi->priv might ever be NULL. Even if pnpi->priv was NULL, we wouldn't need the check. It's ok to call vfree(NULL). > After the two removals I've talked about above, the code will always call > vfree(pnpi->priv) and then free_netdev(netdev). That makes sense. Best regards, Martin
