On Fri, Apr 01, 2022 at 07:46:35AM -0400, Sevinj Aghayeva wrote: > The function iterates an index from 0 to NUM_PMKID_CACHE and returns > the first index for which the condition is true. If no such index is > found, the function returns -1. Current code has a complex control > flow that obfuscates this simple task. Replace it with a loop. > > Also, given the shortened function body, replace the long variable > name psecuritypriv with a short variable name p. > > Reported by checkpatch: > > WARNING: else is not generally useful after a break or return > > Signed-off-by: Sevinj Aghayeva <sevinj.aghayeva@xxxxxxxxx> Wow! Nice find! This is a huge clean up. Extra kudos recognizing that it is not just the else statement which is broken here! The only issue for the patch is that I don't see any maintainer emailed? However, I don't see a maintainer listed in the MAINTAINERS file so ... Reviewed-by: Ira Weiny <ira.weiny@xxxxxxxxx> > --- > drivers/staging/rtl8723bs/core/rtw_mlme.c | 28 ++++++----------------- > 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 21 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/drivers/staging/rtl8723bs/core/rtw_mlme.c b/drivers/staging/rtl8723bs/core/rtw_mlme.c > index d5bb3a5bd2fb..3eacf8f9d236 100644 > --- a/drivers/staging/rtl8723bs/core/rtw_mlme.c > +++ b/drivers/staging/rtl8723bs/core/rtw_mlme.c > @@ -2036,28 +2036,14 @@ int rtw_restruct_wmm_ie(struct adapter *adapter, u8 *in_ie, u8 *out_ie, uint in_ > > static int SecIsInPMKIDList(struct adapter *Adapter, u8 *bssid) > { > - struct security_priv *psecuritypriv = &Adapter->securitypriv; > - int i = 0; > - > - do { > - if ((psecuritypriv->PMKIDList[i].bUsed) && > - (!memcmp(psecuritypriv->PMKIDList[i].Bssid, bssid, ETH_ALEN))) { > - break; > - } else { > - i++; > - /* continue; */ > - } > - > - } while (i < NUM_PMKID_CACHE); > - > - if (i == NUM_PMKID_CACHE) { > - i = -1;/* Could not find. */ > - } else { > - /* There is one Pre-Authentication Key for the specific BSSID. */ > - } > - > - return i; > + struct security_priv *p = &Adapter->securitypriv; > + int i; > > + for (i = 0; i < NUM_PMKID_CACHE; i++) > + if ((p->PMKIDList[i].bUsed) && > + (!memcmp(p->PMKIDList[i].Bssid, bssid, ETH_ALEN))) > + return i; > + return -1; > } > > /* */ > -- > 2.25.1 >