From: Dan Carpenter
> Sent: 31 March 2022 11:40
>
> On Thu, Mar 31, 2022 at 10:29:04AM +0000, David Laight wrote:
> > From: Alaa Mohamed
> > > Sent: 31 March 2022 11:19
> > >
> > > Fix Duplication of Side Effects for GDM_TTY_READY(gdm) macro
> > > reported by checkpatch
> > > "CHECK: Macro argument reuse 'gdm' - possible side-effects?"
> > >
> > > Signed-off-by: Alaa Mohamed <eng.alaamohamedsoliman.am@xxxxxxxxx>
> > > ---
> > > drivers/staging/gdm724x/gdm_tty.c | 4 +++-
> > > 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> > >
> > > diff --git a/drivers/staging/gdm724x/gdm_tty.c b/drivers/staging/gdm724x/gdm_tty.c
> > > index 04df6f9f5403..6f0274470e69 100644
> > > --- a/drivers/staging/gdm724x/gdm_tty.c
> > > +++ b/drivers/staging/gdm724x/gdm_tty.c
> > > @@ -27,7 +27,9 @@
> > >
> > > #define MUX_TX_MAX_SIZE 2048
> > >
> > > -#define GDM_TTY_READY(gdm) (gdm && gdm->tty_dev && gdm->port.count)
> > > +#define GDM_TTY_READY(_gdm) \
> > > + ({ typeof(_gdm) (gdm) = (_gdm); \
> > > + (gdm && gdm->tty_dev && gdm->port.count); })
> >
> > Did you test this?
> >
> > see https://godbolt.org/z/cazPrrzPv
> >
>
> I don't understand the link. The patch should work as far as I can see.
If you call GDM_TTY_READY(gdm) the first line ends up as:
struct xxx *gdm = gdm;
which shadows the parameter.
There's probably a warning about an uninitialised variable as well.
The 'gdm' and '_gdm' would need swapping over.
But, as you said, just:
#define GDM_TTY_READY(gdm) ((gdm) && (gdm)->tty_dev && (gdm)->port.count)
is fine - I'd add the () but not worry about multiple evaluation.
David
-
Registered Address Lakeside, Bramley Road, Mount Farm, Milton Keynes, MK1 1PT, UK
Registration No: 1397386 (Wales)
