Thus wrote Dan Carpenter (dan.carpenter@xxxxxxxxxx): > On Fri, Feb 18, 2022 at 10:22:53AM +0100, Martin Kaiser wrote: > > Would it make sense to add a word of warning to prevent others from > > repeating this exercise? > Just the fact that these structs are endian means they're from the > firmware or the network. > If a struct has a pointer in it, then it's rarely part of the UAPI but > if it has endian data then it probably is. ah, these are useful criteria, thanks. I see that the comment isn't really necessary...
