Hi Dan, On 1/25/22 12:59, Dan Carpenter wrote: [...]
> - service->trace = 0; > atomic_set(&service->poll_flags, 0); Nit: atomic_set(0) can be also removedNo, let's not write code that assumes it knows atomic_t internals.
Isn't atomic_set() just (let's say) "magic" write to memory in all cases? Am I missing some design issue here?
With regards, Pavel Skripkin