Hi Stephen, On Fri, Jan 7, 2022 at 3:10 AM Stephen Boyd <sboyd@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > Quoting Sergio Paracuellos (2021-12-13 04:00:17) > > Hi Stephen, > > > > On Sun, Nov 7, 2021 at 8:42 AM Sergio Paracuellos > > <sergio.paracuellos@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > > > > Hi all, > > > > > > This patch series add minimal change to provide mt7621 resets properly > > > defining them in the 'mediatek,mt7621-sysc' node which is the system > > > controller of the SoC and is already providing clocks to the rest of > > > the world. > > > > > > There is shared architecture code for all ralink platforms in 'reset.c' > > > file located in 'arch/mips/ralink' but the correct thing to do to align > > > hardware with software seems to define and add related reset code to the > > > already mainlined clock driver. > > > > > > After this changes, we can get rid of the useless reset controller node > > > in the device tree and use system controller node instead where the property > > > '#reset-cells' has been added. Binding documentation for this nodeq has > > > been updated with the new property accordly. > > > > > > This series also provide a bindings include header where all related > > > reset bits for the MT7621 SoC are defined. > > > > > > Also, please take a look to this review [0] to understand better motivation > > Is [0] a link? Yes, sorry it was not included: [0]: https://patchwork.ozlabs.org/project/devicetree-bindings/patch/20210926145931.14603-3-sergio.paracuellos@xxxxxxxxx/ > > > > for this series. > > > > > > Regarding the way of merging this: > > > - I'd like patches 1 and 4 which are related going through staging tree. > > > - The other two (patches 2 and 3) can perfectly go through the clock tree. > > > > > > Thanks in advance for your feedback. > > > > > > Changes in v5: > > > - Move platform driver init process into 'arch_initcall' to be sure the > > > rest of the world can get the resets available when needed (since PCIe > > > controller driver has been moved from staging into 'drivers/pci/controller' > > > is probed earlier and reset was not available so it was returning > > > -EPROBE_DEFER on firt try. Moving into 'arch_initcall' avoids the 'a bit > > > anoying' PCI first failed log trace. > > > > Gentle ping on this series. > > > > It looks to largely be a reset controller patch series. Can you get > review from the reset maintainer? > > RESET CONTROLLER FRAMEWORK > M: Philipp Zabel <p.zabel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > S: Maintained Ok, I'll rebase and resend the series including Philipp Zabel for reviewing this. Thanks, Sergio Paracuellos