On Thu, Jan 06, 2022 at 10:19:46AM +0000, Sidong Yang wrote:
> > +int rf69_get_chip_version(struct spi_device *spi)
> > +{
> > + int retval;
> > +
> > + retval = rf69_read_reg(spi, REG_VERSION);
> > + return retval;
> > +}
> > +
> If we don't modify retval, why don't we just return directly without
> retval?
fair point, I will change that.
> > @@ -17,6 +17,7 @@
> > #define FIFO_SIZE 66 /* bytes */
> > #define FIFO_THRESHOLD 15 /* bytes */
> >
> > +int rf69_get_chip_version(struct spi_device *spi);
> IMHO, I think that we don't need to include 'chip'. Because all other
> functions in this code don't have 'chip' in function name. and version
> code seems to be more accurate representation.
>
will change that too. Thanks for taking the time to review this patch.
thanks,
Paulo A.
