Re: [PATCH v3] staging: pi433: add comment to rx_lock mutex definition

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

To: Paulo Miguel Almeida <paulo.miguel.almeida.rodenas@xxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] staging: pi433: add comment to rx_lock mutex definition
From: Greg KH <gregkh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 3 Jan 2022 14:29:39 +0100
Cc: realwakka@xxxxxxxxx, linux-staging@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <20211230152931.GA6157@localhost.localdomain>
References: <20211230152931.GA6157@localhost.localdomain>

On Fri, Dec 31, 2021 at 04:29:31AM +1300, Paulo Miguel Almeida wrote:
> Checkpatch reports: CHECK: struct mutex definition without comment.
> Fix this by documenting what rx_mutex struct is used for in pi433 driver.

Please wrap your changelog comments at 72 columns.

thanks,

greg k-h

Follow-Ups:
- [PATCH v4] staging: pi433: add comment to rx_lock mutex definition
  - From: Paulo Miguel Almeida

References:
- [PATCH v3] staging: pi433: add comment to rx_lock mutex definition
  - From: Paulo Miguel Almeida

Prev by Date: Re: [PATCH] staging: r8188eu: remove unneeded ret variables
Next by Date: Re: [PATCH v2] staging: greybus: audio: Check null pointer
Previous by thread: [PATCH v3] staging: pi433: add comment to rx_lock mutex definition
Next by thread: [PATCH v4] staging: pi433: add comment to rx_lock mutex definition
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [Linux Driver Development] [Linux Driver Backports] [DMA Engine] [Linux GPIO] [Linux SPI] [Video for Linux] [Linux USB Devel] [Linux Coverity] [Linux Audio Users] [Linux Kernel] [Linux SCSI] [Yosemite Backpacking]

Powered by Linux