Re: [PATCH v3] staging: vt6655: refactor byRadioCtl to radio_ctl

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 12/3/21 23:24, Alberto Merciai wrote:
Replace camelcase hungarian notated variable "byRadioCtl"
into linux kernel coding style equivalent variable "radio_ctl".

Signed-off-by: Alberto Merciai <alb3rt0.m3rciai@xxxxxxxxx>
---

v2 -> v3
- replace typo inside mail message body
v1 -> v2
- Correct mail subject

  drivers/staging/vt6655/device.h      | 2 +-
  drivers/staging/vt6655/device_main.c | 8 ++++----
  2 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/staging/vt6655/device.h b/drivers/staging/vt6655/device.h
index c51eba94230d..245f992e5a23 100644
--- a/drivers/staging/vt6655/device.h
+++ b/drivers/staging/vt6655/device.h
@@ -227,7 +227,7 @@ struct vnt_private {
  	bool bPWBitOn;
/* GPIO Radio Control */
-	unsigned char byRadioCtl;
+	unsigned char radio_ctl;
  	unsigned char byGPIO;
  	bool hw_radio_off;
  	bool bPrvActive4RadioOFF;
diff --git a/drivers/staging/vt6655/device_main.c b/drivers/staging/vt6655/device_main.c
index 897d70cf32b8..37a82550ca82 100644
--- a/drivers/staging/vt6655/device_main.c
+++ b/drivers/staging/vt6655/device_main.c
@@ -371,18 +371,18 @@ static void device_init_registers(struct vnt_private *priv)
priv->radio_off = false; - priv->byRadioCtl = SROMbyReadEmbedded(priv->port_offset,
+	priv->radio_ctl = SROMbyReadEmbedded(priv->port_offset,
  					      EEP_OFS_RADIOCTL);
  	priv->hw_radio_off = false;
- if (priv->byRadioCtl & EEP_RADIOCTL_ENABLE) {
+	if (priv->radio_ctl & EEP_RADIOCTL_ENABLE) {
  		/* Get GPIO */
  		MACvGPIOIn(priv->port_offset, &priv->byGPIO);
if (((priv->byGPIO & GPIO0_DATA) &&
-		     !(priv->byRadioCtl & EEP_RADIOCTL_INV)) ||
+		     !(priv->radio_ctl & EEP_RADIOCTL_INV)) ||
  		     (!(priv->byGPIO & GPIO0_DATA) &&
-		     (priv->byRadioCtl & EEP_RADIOCTL_INV)))
+		     (priv->radio_ctl & EEP_RADIOCTL_INV)))
  			priv->hw_radio_off = true;
  	}

This one is odd. Code uses byRadioCtl as local storage to check register value within one function...

I might be missing something, but I think, it can be removed as well.




With regards,
Pavel Skripkin




[Index of Archives]     [Linux Driver Development]     [Linux Driver Backports]     [DMA Engine]     [Linux GPIO]     [Linux SPI]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Coverity]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [Yosemite Backpacking]
  Powered by Linux