On Sun, 7 Nov 2021 at 17:35, Larry Finger <Larry.Finger@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> In commit 221abd4d478a ("staging: r8188eu: Remove no more necessary definitions
> and code"), two entries were removed from RTW_ChannelPlanMap[], but not replaced
> with zeros. The position within this table is important, thus the patch broke
> systems operating in regulatory domains osted later than entry 0x13 in the table.
> Unfortunately, the FCC entry comes before that point and most testers did not see
> this problem.
>
> Reported-and-tested-by: Zameer Manji <zmanji@xxxxxxxxx>
> Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@xxxxxxxxx>
> Fixes: 221abd4d478a ("staging: r8188eu: Remove no more necessary definitions and code")
> Cc: Stable <stable@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> # v5.5+
> Signed-off-by: Larry Finger <Larry.Finger@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
>
> v2 - fixed use of () rsther than {} - found by kernel test robot
> ---
> drivers/staging/r8188eu/core/rtw_mlme_ext.c | 2 ++
> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/staging/r8188eu/core/rtw_mlme_ext.c b/drivers/staging/r8188eu/core/rtw_mlme_ext.c
> index 55c3d4a6faeb..5b60e6df5f87 100644
> --- a/drivers/staging/r8188eu/core/rtw_mlme_ext.c
> +++ b/drivers/staging/r8188eu/core/rtw_mlme_ext.c
> @@ -107,6 +107,7 @@ static struct rt_channel_plan_map RTW_ChannelPlanMap[RT_CHANNEL_DOMAIN_MAX] = {
> {0x01}, /* 0x10, RT_CHANNEL_DOMAIN_JAPAN */
> {0x02}, /* 0x11, RT_CHANNEL_DOMAIN_FCC_NO_DFS */
> {0x01}, /* 0x12, RT_CHANNEL_DOMAIN_JAPAN_NO_DFS */
> + {0x00}, /* 0x13 */
> {0x02}, /* 0x14, RT_CHANNEL_DOMAIN_TAIWAN_NO_DFS */
> {0x00}, /* 0x15, RT_CHANNEL_DOMAIN_ETSI_NO_DFS */
> {0x00}, /* 0x16, RT_CHANNEL_DOMAIN_KOREA_NO_DFS */
> @@ -118,6 +119,7 @@ static struct rt_channel_plan_map RTW_ChannelPlanMap[RT_CHANNEL_DOMAIN_MAX] = {
> {0x00}, /* 0x1C, */
> {0x00}, /* 0x1D, */
> {0x00}, /* 0x1E, */
> + {0x00}, /* 0x1F, */
> /* 0x20 ~ 0x7F , New Define ===== */
> {0x00}, /* 0x20, RT_CHANNEL_DOMAIN_WORLD_NULL */
> {0x01}, /* 0x21, RT_CHANNEL_DOMAIN_ETSI1_NULL */
> --
> 2.33.1
>
Reviewed-by: Phillip Potter <phil@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Regards,
Phil
