On Mon, 2021-11-01 at 17:30 +0100, Fabio M. De Francesco wrote: > On Monday, November 1, 2021 4:11:26 PM CET Larry Finger wrote: > > Incidentally, I disagree with checkpatch in that I think that > > sizeof(struct foo) is more descriptive than sizeof(*bar). > I agree with you in full It's not checkpatch in particular, it's from coding-style The preferred form for passing a size of a struct is the following: .. code-block:: c p = kmalloc(sizeof(*p), ...);