On Monday, November 1, 2021 4:18:03 PM CET Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote: > On Mon, Nov 01, 2021 at 03:27:32PM +0100, Fabio M. De Francesco wrote: > > Use the GFP_ATOMIC flag of kzalloc() with two memory allocation in > > report_del_sta_event(). This function is called while holding spinlocks, > > therefore it is not allowed to sleep. With the GFP_ATOMIC type flag, the > > allocation is high priority and must not sleep. > > > > This issue is detected by Smatch which emits the following warning: > > "drivers/staging/r8188eu/core/rtw_mlme_ext.c:6848 report_del_sta_event() > > warn: sleeping in atomic context". > > > > After the change, the post-commit hook output the following message: > > "CHECK: Prefer kzalloc(sizeof(*pcmd_obj)...) over > > kzalloc(sizeof(struct cmd_obj)...)". > > > > According to the above "CHECK", use the preferred style in the first > > kzalloc(). > > > > Signed-off-by: Fabio M. De Francesco <fmdefrancesco@xxxxxxxxx> > > --- > > > > v1->v2: Fix an overlooked error due to an incorrect copy-paste > > of the sizeof() operator. > > What commit does this fix? > > thanks, > > greg k-h > Sorry, Greg. Please let me know if I understand correctly what you are asking for... In v1 I introduced a silly error while copy-pasting "sizeof()" and then I fixed it in v2. I think that you mean that I should reword the list of changes from v1 because I'm not explaining properly why I submitted v2. Is my understanding correct? If so, I have no problem in submitting v3. Thank you in advance, Fabio P.S.: I had to resend this email and I want apologize for the noise. It seems that it contained HTML parts and for this reasons it was rejected by the relevant lists.
