Re: [Outreachy kernel] [PATCH 2/7] staging: vt6655: Use incrementation in `idx`

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 28-10-2021 16:05, Karolina Drobnik wrote:
> Increment `idx` in a loop instead of adding the loop counter
> `i` to do so. Thanks to this change, the cast to unsigned short
> can be removed.

> 
> Signed-off-by: Karolina Drobnik <karolinadrobnik@xxxxxxxxx>
> ---
>  drivers/staging/vt6655/rf.c | 16 ++++++++--------
>  1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/staging/vt6655/rf.c b/drivers/staging/vt6655/rf.c
> index f195dafb6e63..c07653566d17 100644
> --- a/drivers/staging/vt6655/rf.c
> +++ b/drivers/staging/vt6655/rf.c
> @@ -700,11 +700,11 @@ bool RFvWriteWakeProgSyn(struct vnt_private *priv, unsigned char rf_type,
>  			return false;
>  
>  		for (i = 0; i < CB_AL2230_INIT_SEQ; i++)
> -			MACvSetMISCFifo(priv, (unsigned short)(idx + i), al2230_init_table[i]);
> +			MACvSetMISCFifo(priv, idx++, al2230_init_table[i]);
>  
> -		MACvSetMISCFifo(priv, (unsigned short)(idx + i), al2230_channel_table0[channel - 1]);
> +		MACvSetMISCFifo(priv, idx++, al2230_channel_table0[channel - 1]);
>  		i++;
> -		MACvSetMISCFifo(priv, (unsigned short)(idx + i), al2230_channel_table1[channel - 1]);
> +		MACvSetMISCFifo(priv, idx++, al2230_channel_table1[channel - 1]);
>  		break;
>  
>  		/* Need to check, PLLON need to be low for channel setting */
> @@ -717,17 +717,17 @@ bool RFvWriteWakeProgSyn(struct vnt_private *priv, unsigned char rf_type,
>  
>  		if (channel <= CB_MAX_CHANNEL_24G) {
>  			for (i = 0; i < CB_AL7230_INIT_SEQ; i++)
> -				MACvSetMISCFifo(priv, (unsigned short)(idx + i), al7230_init_table[i]);
> +				MACvSetMISCFifo(priv, idx++, al7230_init_table[i]);

If I'm not wrong, there is a problem here, we are using the modified idx value here, instead of original which is *MISCFIFO_SYNDATA_IDX*.
I don't see idx value being reset either. Am I missing something ?

Further, this bring a question, how are you validating or planning to validate these changes ?

>  		} else {
>  			for (i = 0; i < CB_AL7230_INIT_SEQ; i++)
> -				MACvSetMISCFifo(priv, (unsigned short)(idx + i), al7230_init_table_a_mode[i]);
> +				MACvSetMISCFifo(priv, idx++, al7230_init_table_a_mode[i]);
>  		}
>  
> -		MACvSetMISCFifo(priv, (unsigned short)(idx + i), al7230_channel_table0[channel - 1]);
> +		MACvSetMISCFifo(priv, idx++, al7230_channel_table0[channel - 1]);
>  		i++;
> -		MACvSetMISCFifo(priv, (unsigned short)(idx + i), al7230_channel_table1[channel - 1]);
> +		MACvSetMISCFifo(priv, idx++, al7230_channel_table1[channel - 1]);
>  		i++;
> -		MACvSetMISCFifo(priv, (unsigned short)(idx + i), al7230_channel_table2[channel - 1]);
> +		MACvSetMISCFifo(priv, idx++, al7230_channel_table2[channel - 1]);
>  		break;
>  
>  	case RF_NOTHING:
> 

Regards,

~Praveen.




[Index of Archives]     [Linux Driver Development]     [Linux Driver Backports]     [DMA Engine]     [Linux GPIO]     [Linux SPI]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Coverity]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [Yosemite Backpacking]
  Powered by Linux