On Wed, 2021-10-20 at 10:54 +0200, Julia Lawall wrote:
> On Wed, 20 Oct 2021, Karolina Drobnik wrote:
>
> > Drop `by` prefix in the first parameter of `bb_get_frame_time`
> > function.
> > As the original argument, `byPreambleType`, was renamed to
> > `preamble_type`,
> > the parameter referring to it is now renamed to match the new
> > naming
> > convention.
> > Update `bb_get_frame_time` comment to reflect that change.
> >
> > This patch is a follow-up work to this commit:
> > Commit 548b6d7ebfa4 ("staging: vt6655: Rename byPreambleType
> > field")
>
> This is not going to be practical. If the previous patch is
> accepted, then this it not needed.
This change was there before but Greg told me to do only one logical
change per patch (which was a struct member rename), so I reverted it.
I believe this is needed because this parameter still uses Hungarian
notation, which is against the LK coding style. Also, it makes sense to
update the name given my previous change.
> there needs to be a vn+1 putting the patches together into a series.
I didn't know that it should be send this way, especially given the
fact that Outreachy applicants should first get 3-5 patches out before
creating a patchset. Or has something changed in this regard?
> > @@ -1691,7 +1691,7 @@ static const unsigned short
> > awc_frame_time[MAX_RATE] = {
> > *
> > * Parameters:
> > * In:
> > - * by_preamble_type - Preamble Type
> > + * preamble_type - Preamble Type
> > * by_pkt_type - PK_TYPE_11A, PK_TYPE_11B,
> > PK_TYPE_11GB, PK_TYPE_11GA
>
> In the realm of small cleanups to this driver, the extra space in
> front of the - above is a bit annoying.
I can add this in but will that still count as a one logical change?
I described the comment update, will that suffice?
> > @@ -1717,7 +1717,7 @@ unsigned int bb_get_frame_time(unsigned char
> > by_preamble_type,
> > rate = (unsigned int)awc_frame_time[rate_idx];
> >
> > if (rate_idx <= 3) { /* CCK mode */
> > - if (by_preamble_type == 1) /* Short */
> > + if (preamble_type == 1) /* Short */
>
> I hope you will get around to replacing the 1 by the appropriate
> constant and removing the "Short" comment.
I plan to do so after correcting the name variable.
On Wed, 2021-10-20 at 10:55 +0200, Greg KH wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 20, 2021 at 09:40:33AM +0100, Karolina Drobnik wrote:
> > Drop `by` prefix in the first parameter of `bb_get_frame_time`
> > function.
> > As the original argument, `byPreambleType`, was renamed to
> > `preamble_type`,
> > the parameter referring to it is now renamed to match the new
> > naming
> > convention.
> > Update `bb_get_frame_time` comment to reflect that change.
> >
> > This patch is a follow-up work to this commit:
> > Commit 548b6d7ebfa4 ("staging: vt6655: Rename byPreambleType
> > field")
>
> There is no need for these two lines in the changelog text. They can
> go
> below --- if you want to have them.
Thank you for clarifying this. I've been following the Submitting
Patches docs[1] and thought this is needed.
Thanks,
Karolina
-------------------------------------------------------------------
[1]:
https://elixir.bootlin.com/linux/latest/source/Documentation/process/submitting-patches.rst#L106
