Hi, On 9/27/21 5:30 AM, Longji Guo wrote: > kfree(NULL) is safe and the check 'if (pstat->passoc_req)' before kfree > is not necessary. > > Signed-off-by: Longji Guo <guolongji@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> > --- > drivers/staging/rtl8723bs/core/rtw_mlme_ext.c | 8 +++----- > 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/drivers/staging/rtl8723bs/core/rtw_mlme_ext.c b/drivers/staging/rtl8723bs/core/rtw_mlme_ext.c > index 375d2a742dd2..a46ab97524aa 100644 > --- a/drivers/staging/rtl8723bs/core/rtw_mlme_ext.c > +++ b/drivers/staging/rtl8723bs/core/rtw_mlme_ext.c > @@ -1344,11 +1344,9 @@ unsigned int OnAssocReq(struct adapter *padapter, union recv_frame *precv_frame) > issue_asocrsp(padapter, status, pstat, WIFI_REASSOCRSP); > > spin_lock_bh(&pstat->lock); > - if (pstat->passoc_req) { > - kfree(pstat->passoc_req); > - pstat->passoc_req = NULL; > - pstat->assoc_req_len = 0; > - } > + kfree(pstat->passoc_req); > + pstat->passoc_req = NULL; This "pstat->passoc_req = NULL;" is not necessary, since directly afterwards pstat->passoc_req gets overwritten with the return value from rtw_zmalloc() so please drop this line too. Regards, Hans > + pstat->assoc_req_len = 0; > > pstat->passoc_req = rtw_zmalloc(pkt_len); > if (pstat->passoc_req) { >