On 9/23/21 11:47, Pavel Skripkin wrote:
On 9/22/21 16:21, Pavel Skripkin wrote:
On 9/21/21 21:18, Fabio M. De Francesco wrote:
From: Pavel Skripkin <paskripkin@xxxxxxxxx>
This mutex was used to protect shared buffer for USB requests. Since
buffer was removed in previous patch we can remove this mutex as well.
Furthermore, because it was used to serialize the calls to the Core USB
API, we thoroughly tested the enabling of concurrent firing of USB requests
without the mutex and found no problems of any kind in common use cases.
Co-developed-by: Fabio M. De Francesco <fmdefrancesco@xxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Fabio M. De Francesco <fmdefrancesco@xxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Pavel Skripkin <paskripkin@xxxxxxxxx>
Hi, Greg!
If all is OK with previous 15 patches, please, do not take this one, it
causes problems with connection... :)
I don't understand what went wrong after v8, but anyway, this one should
not be applied for now, since it's broken
Thank you
Just to be clear: previous 15 patches _are_ tested and do not cause any
misbehavior or bugs.
I guess, the stack buffer maybe the problem here, since it's the only
change on this side since v8. I didn't have a chance to take a closer
look, but I will do it on weekends, I hope :)
Oh, I found the problem by just looking at the code with clear mind:
-free_dvobj:
- if (status != _SUCCESS && pdvobjpriv) {
+ if (pdvobjpriv) {
usb_set_intfdata(usb_intf, NULL);
kfree(pdvobjpriv);
pdvobjpriv = NULL;
This if should be deleted completely, because we don't want to fail on
every probe :)
Sorry for noise... :(
Greg, can you take first 15 patches, if they look good and then I will
send fixed version of 16? AFAIU, you are ok with taking part of the series
Thank you
With regards,
Pavel Skripkin
