On Monday, September 20, 2021 1:32:21 PM CEST Dan Carpenter wrote: > On Mon, Sep 20, 2021 at 01:13:54PM +0200, Fabio M. De Francesco wrote: > > On Monday, September 20, 2021 12:36:06 PM CEST Greg KH wrote: > > > On Sat, Sep 18, 2021 at 10:52:50PM +0530, Saurav Girepunje wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > On 13/09/21 9:48 pm, Greg KH wrote: > > > > > On Fri, Sep 10, 2021 at 11:24:39PM +0530, Saurav Girepunje wrote: > > > > > > Remove the function power_saving_wk_hdl() as it just calling > > > > > > the rtw_ps_processor().Instead of power_saving_wk_hdl() call directly > > > > > > rtw_ps_processor(). > > > > > > > > > > > > Signed-off-by: Saurav Girepunje <saurav.girepunje@xxxxxxxxx> > > > > > > > > > > [] > > > > > > > > > > Also does not apply to my tree. Please rebase against my staging- next > > > > > branch and resend. > > > > > > > > > > thanks, > > > > > > > > > > greg k-h > > > > > > > > > > > > > Hi Greg, > > > > > > > > I always do rebase against your staging-testing branch. Can you help me > > to > > > > understand.When we need to rebase on staging-next. Do we always need to > > > > rebase against staging-next..! > > > > > > Yes, you should. When you are working on code that lots of other people > > > are working on, there will be conflicts like this, and you just need to > > > stay on top of it. > > > > > > thanks, > > > > > > greg k-h > > > > > > > Sorry, Greg. I'm confused... :( > > > > As far as I know, everyone here make patches for staging-testing. > > Nope. It's only you. And Saurav (at least) :) I've been misled and in turn I misled Pavel. This is due to a guide in kernelnewbies.org that explicitly says to use staging-testing: https://kernelnewbies.org/OutreachyfirstpatchSetup In that page the is a section ("Set up your Linux kernel code repository") which says: "[] Then use the revision control system called git to clone Greg Kroah-Hartman's staging tree repository: git clone -b staging-testing git:// git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/gregkh/staging.git". I assumed that those instructions must be followed also by developers that are not (anymore) in the Outreachy program. Obviously, I was wrong in assuming the above. Thanks for your reply, Dan. Regards, Fabio > > The staging-testing branch can be rebased so maybe you will write a > patch against something that never makes it to staging-next and everyone > will be puzzled. > > That's unlikely to happen and we won't be puzzled for long because we > try not to invest too much time wondering why patches don't apply. > > regards, > dan carpenter >
