On Friday, September 17, 2021 4:45:29 PM CEST Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 17, 2021 at 09:18:34AM +0200, Fabio M. De Francesco wrote:
> > Clean up rtw_read{8,16,32}() and rtw_write{8,16,32,N}() in
usb_ops_linux.c.
> >
> > 1) Rename variables:
> > length => len
> > pio_priv => io_priv
> > pintfhdl => intfhdl
> > wvalue => address.
>
> Wait, why are you changing wvalue? Isn't that the USB name for this
> variable in the USB message sent to the device? Check the USB spec
> before changing this, that is a common field and probably should not be
> changed.
Oh, sorry. This was due to my very limited knowledge of the USB subsystems
and its Core API. So I misunderstood the semantics of this "wvalue" argument
and we'll change it to "value" (just to remove that unnecessary 'w', that I
guess is for "word").
I had thought that the mere knowledge of C and OS kernels (from a theoretical
perspective) would suffice to work on the code that we change in our patches.
Now I understand that such a naive approach is clearly wrong.
I have been too lazy to open your LDD 3rd ed. for reading but now I have
decided that it is time to do it. Furthermore, I have found one more book
about Linux device drivers and I'm about to read also its "Linux USB device
drivers" chapter.
I think that by this evening I'll have some basic knowledge of the USB
subsystem, at least of what is needed to avoid future mistakes like the one
you noticed. :)
Thank you very much for the time you spent reviewing our code and for taking
the first 14 patches,
Fabio
>
> thanks,
>
> greg k-h
