On Mon, 6 Sept 2021 at 09:26, Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> On Mon, Sep 06, 2021 at 02:00:54AM +0100, Phillip Potter wrote:
> > Remove hal_reset_security_engine function pointer from struct hal_ops,
> > as it is unused.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Phillip Potter <phil@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > ---
> > drivers/staging/r8188eu/include/hal_intf.h | 1 -
> > 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/staging/r8188eu/include/hal_intf.h b/drivers/staging/r8188eu/include/hal_intf.h
> > index 5612274dea4d..3cbe6c277677 100644
> > --- a/drivers/staging/r8188eu/include/hal_intf.h
> > +++ b/drivers/staging/r8188eu/include/hal_intf.h
> > @@ -250,7 +250,6 @@ struct hal_ops {
> > u32 bndy_cnt);
> >
> > void (*hal_notch_filter)(struct adapter *adapter, bool enable);
> > - void (*hal_reset_security_engine)(struct adapter *adapter);
> > c2h_id_filter c2h_id_filter_ccx;
> > };
>
> I love these patchsets which are removing the HAL layer, but it would
> be better if you folded patches 1 and 2 together because it would be
> easier to review. That way we can just say "Well, if this patch isn't
> correct it will cause a compile error so let's assume it's correct
> unless the kbuild-bot complains."
>
> There are other pairs in this patchset which are the same way where they
> would be easier to review if they were merged. 3 & 4. 5 & 6. Etc.
>
> The patcheset is fine but for future reference please fold them together.
>
> Reviewed-by: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@xxxxxxxxxx>
>
> regards,
> dan carpenter
>
Dear Dan,
Thank you for the review, much appreciated. I will endeavour to do
this in future.
Regards,
Phil
