On 8/18/2021 3:14 PM, Gustavo A. R. Silva wrote:
Fix the following fallthrough warnings:
drivers/staging/r8188eu/core/rtw_mlme_ext.c:1498:3: warning: unannotated fall-through between switch labels [-Wimplicit-fallthrough]
drivers/staging/r8188eu/core/rtw_wlan_util.c:1113:4: warning: unannotated fall-through between switch labels [-Wimplicit-fallthrough]
drivers/staging/r8188eu/core/rtw_wlan_util.c:1147:4: warning: unannotated fall-through between switch labels [-Wimplicit-fallthrough]
drivers/staging/r8188eu/core/rtw_wlan_util.c:1405:3: warning: unannotated fall-through between switch labels [-Wimplicit-fallthrough]
This helps with the ongoing efforts to globally enable
-Wimplicit-fallthrough for Clang.
Link: https://github.com/KSPP/linux/issues/115
Signed-off-by: Gustavo A. R. Silva <gustavoars@xxxxxxxxxx>
Reviewed-by: Nathan Chancellor <nathan@xxxxxxxxxx>
One small comment below.
---
drivers/staging/r8188eu/core/rtw_mlme_ext.c | 1 +
drivers/staging/r8188eu/core/rtw_wlan_util.c | 3 +++
2 files changed, 4 insertions(+)
diff --git a/drivers/staging/r8188eu/core/rtw_mlme_ext.c b/drivers/staging/r8188eu/core/rtw_mlme_ext.c
index 61b239651e1a..590a4572c23f 100644
--- a/drivers/staging/r8188eu/core/rtw_mlme_ext.c
+++ b/drivers/staging/r8188eu/core/rtw_mlme_ext.c
@@ -1495,6 +1495,7 @@ unsigned int OnAssocRsp(struct adapter *padapter, struct recv_frame *precv_frame
break;
case _ERPINFO_IE_:
ERP_IE_handler(padapter, pIE);
+ break;
default:
break;
}
diff --git a/drivers/staging/r8188eu/core/rtw_wlan_util.c b/drivers/staging/r8188eu/core/rtw_wlan_util.c
index cddacf023fa6..e0ce2b796abe 100644
--- a/drivers/staging/r8188eu/core/rtw_wlan_util.c
+++ b/drivers/staging/r8188eu/core/rtw_wlan_util.c
@@ -1110,6 +1110,7 @@ unsigned int is_ap_in_tkip(struct adapter *padapter)
case _RSN_IE_2_:
if (!memcmp((pIE->data + 8), RSN_TKIP_CIPHER, 4))
return true;
+ break;
default:
break;
}
@@ -1144,6 +1145,7 @@ unsigned int should_forbid_n_rate(struct adapter *padapter)
if ((!memcmp((pIE->data + 8), RSN_CIPHER_SUITE_CCMP, 4)) ||
(!memcmp((pIE->data + 12), RSN_CIPHER_SUITE_CCMP, 4)))
return false;
+ break;
default:
break;
}
@@ -1401,6 +1403,7 @@ unsigned char check_assoc_AP(u8 *pframe, uint len)
} else {
break;
}
+ break;
Would it be better to just remove the else branch at the same time? As
far as I can tell, there is no reason to have it.
default:
break;
