On 7/30/21 5:37 AM, Fabio M. De Francesco wrote:
Remove the functions and variables from rtw_security.c that are no more
necessary since the patch that replaces getcrc32() with crc32_le().
Signed-off-by: Fabio M. De Francesco <fmdefrancesco@xxxxxxxxx>
---
drivers/staging/r8188eu/core/rtw_security.c | 37 ---------------------
1 file changed, 37 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/staging/r8188eu/core/rtw_security.c b/drivers/staging/r8188eu/core/rtw_security.c
index 9625beea4b3c..136ba1e61dca 100644
--- a/drivers/staging/r8188eu/core/rtw_security.c
+++ b/drivers/staging/r8188eu/core/rtw_security.c
@@ -74,43 +74,6 @@ static void arcfour_encrypt(struct arc4context *parc4ctx, u8 *dest, u8 *src, u32
}
-static int bcrc32initialized;
-static u32 crc32_table[256];
-
-static u8 crc32_reverseBit(u8 data)
-{
- return (u8)((data<<7)&0x80) | ((data<<5)&0x40) | ((data<<3)&0x20) |
- ((data<<1)&0x10) | ((data>>1)&0x08) | ((data>>3)&0x04) |
- ((data>>5)&0x02) | ((data>>7)&0x01);
-}
-
-static void crc32_init(void)
-{
- if (bcrc32initialized == 1) {
- return;
- } else {
- int i, j;
- u32 c;
- u8 *p = (u8 *)&c, *p1;
- u8 k;
-
- c = 0x12340000;
-
- for (i = 0; i < 256; ++i) {
- k = crc32_reverseBit((u8)i);
- for (c = ((u32)k) << 24, j = 8; j > 0; --j)
- c = c & 0x80000000 ? (c << 1) ^ CRC32_POLY : (c << 1);
- p1 = (u8 *)&crc32_table[i];
-
- p1[0] = crc32_reverseBit(p[3]);
- p1[1] = crc32_reverseBit(p[2]);
- p1[2] = crc32_reverseBit(p[1]);
- p1[3] = crc32_reverseBit(p[0]);
- }
- bcrc32initialized = 1;
- }
-}
-
/*
Need to consider the fragment situation
*/
These two patches are
Tested-by: Larry Finger <Larry.Finger@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Thanks for your contribution.
Larry