Em Wed, 21 Jul 2021 11:25:47 +0200 Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> escreveu: > On Sat, Jul 17, 2021 at 11:58:16AM +0200, Mauro Carvalho Chehab wrote: > > There are lots of fields at struct hi6421_spmi_pmic that aren't > > used. In a matter of fact, only regmap is needed. > > > > So, drop the struct as a hole, and set just the regmap as > > the drvdata. > > > > While here, add a missing dot at the Huawei's copyrights. > > > > Acked-by: Mark Brown <broonie@xxxxxxxxxx> > > Signed-off-by: Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab+huawei@xxxxxxxxxx> > > --- > > drivers/misc/hi6421v600-irq.c | 9 ++++---- > > drivers/regulator/hi6421v600-regulator.c | 10 ++++----- > > drivers/staging/hikey9xx/hi6421-spmi-pmic.c | 16 +++++-------- > > include/linux/mfd/hi6421-spmi-pmic.h | 25 --------------------- > > 4 files changed, 14 insertions(+), 46 deletions(-) > > delete mode 100644 include/linux/mfd/hi6421-spmi-pmic.h > > This patch fails to apply to my 5.14-rc2 tree, it gets a failure in the > regulator portion of the patch. Hi Greg, This one depends on a regression-fix patch merged via this branch: https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/broonie/regulator.git for-next The patch is this one[1]: https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/broonie/regulator.git/commit/drivers/regulator/hi6421v600-regulator.c?id=5db5dd5be70eaf808d9fd90174b957fc5c2912cb Mark, Is this branch stable or do you rebase it? If the branch is stable, then perhaps Greg could merge from it before applying the remaining patches from this series. - [1] There's no need of backporting the fix to stable, as the driver won't work with upstream Kernels without patches 8 and 9 from this series containing the Open Firmware data needed to probe it. Thanks, Mauro
