On 5/19/21 1:19 PM, F.A.Sulaiman wrote:
This patch fix "Alignment should match open parenthesis" checkpatch error.
Signed-off-by: "F.A.Sulaiman" <asha.16@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
I have mixed feelings about this one. This alignment rule
is fine, but I personally don't think it improves things.
Aside from that, there are a few more places in the Greybus
code that lead to exactly this warning. So I guess, if we're
going to have the code follow this alignment rule, why not
just fix all spots at once (i.e., in a patch series)?
Anyway, I'll offer this, but perhaps others can provide
their opinion.
Acked-by: Alex Elder <elder@xxxxxxxxxx>
---
drivers/staging/greybus/gbphy.c | 4 ++--
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/staging/greybus/gbphy.c b/drivers/staging/greybus/gbphy.c
index 9fc5c47be9bd..13d319860da5 100644
--- a/drivers/staging/greybus/gbphy.c
+++ b/drivers/staging/greybus/gbphy.c
@@ -27,7 +27,7 @@ struct gbphy_host {
static DEFINE_IDA(gbphy_id);
static ssize_t protocol_id_show(struct device *dev,
- struct device_attribute *attr, char *buf)
+ struct device_attribute *attr, char *buf)
{
struct gbphy_device *gbphy_dev = to_gbphy_dev(dev);
@@ -221,7 +221,7 @@ void gb_gbphy_deregister_driver(struct gbphy_driver *driver)
EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(gb_gbphy_deregister_driver);
static struct gbphy_device *gb_gbphy_create_dev(struct gb_bundle *bundle,
- struct greybus_descriptor_cport *cport_desc)
+ struct greybus_descriptor_cport *cport_desc)
{
struct gbphy_device *gbphy_dev;
int retval;
