Hi Bryan,
On Tue, May 18, 2021 at 02:45:19PM +0000, Bryan Brattlof wrote:
> 'if (true) { ... }' will always evaluate to true. Remove it and
> save a few tabs for somewhere else.
>
> Signed-off-by: Bryan Brattlof <hello@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> drivers/staging/rtl8723bs/core/rtw_ap.c | 159 ++++++++++++------------
> 1 file changed, 78 insertions(+), 81 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/staging/rtl8723bs/core/rtw_ap.c b/drivers/staging/rtl8723bs/core/rtw_ap.c
> index 9df4476b2e2d..98b1bec67999 100644
> --- a/drivers/staging/rtl8723bs/core/rtw_ap.c
> +++ b/drivers/staging/rtl8723bs/core/rtw_ap.c
> @@ -59,112 +59,109 @@ static void update_BCNTIM(struct adapter *padapter)
>
I was wondering why are you using the first patch of a nine patch
series as a 'cover letter' of an eight patch patchset.
In other words, why putting the In-Reply-To field of all patches subsequent
to the first one ponting to the first patch itself as a cover letter,
is it a recommened practice?
thank you,
fabio
