Re: [PATCH 08/10] staging: vchiq_core: drop vchiq_status from vchiq_set_service_option

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Thu, 2021-04-22 at 22:07 +0200, Stefan Wahren wrote:
> Replace the custom set of return values with proper Linux error codes for
> vchiq_set_service_option(). Now we can use the result directly as return
> value for vchiq_ioctl().
> 
> Signed-off-by: Stefan Wahren <stefan.wahren@xxxxxxxx>
> ---
>  .../vc04_services/interface/vchiq_arm/vchiq_arm.c      |  4 ++--
>  .../vc04_services/interface/vchiq_arm/vchiq_core.c     | 18 +++++++++---------
>  .../vc04_services/interface/vchiq_arm/vchiq_core.h     |  2 +-
>  3 files changed, 12 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/staging/vc04_services/interface/vchiq_arm/vchiq_arm.c b/drivers/staging/vc04_services/interface/vchiq_arm/vchiq_arm.c
> index 3395201..ab2ce07 100644
> --- a/drivers/staging/vc04_services/interface/vchiq_arm/vchiq_arm.c
> +++ b/drivers/staging/vc04_services/interface/vchiq_arm/vchiq_arm.c
> @@ -1517,8 +1517,8 @@ vchiq_ioctl(struct file *file, unsigned int cmd, unsigned long arg)
>  			break;
>  		}
>  
> 
> -		status = vchiq_set_service_option(
> -				args.handle, args.option, args.value);
> +		ret = vchiq_set_service_option(args.handle, args.option,
> +					       args.value);
>  	} break;
>  
> 
>  	case VCHIQ_IOC_LIB_VERSION: {
> diff --git a/drivers/staging/vc04_services/interface/vchiq_arm/vchiq_core.c b/drivers/staging/vc04_services/interface/vchiq_arm/vchiq_core.c
> index 9f9677a..31c1c1a 100644
> --- a/drivers/staging/vc04_services/interface/vchiq_arm/vchiq_core.c
> +++ b/drivers/staging/vc04_services/interface/vchiq_arm/vchiq_core.c
> @@ -3371,21 +3371,21 @@ void vchiq_get_config(struct vchiq_config *config)
>  	config->version_min            = VCHIQ_VERSION_MIN;
>  }
>  
> 
> -enum vchiq_status
> +int
>  vchiq_set_service_option(unsigned int handle,
>  	enum vchiq_service_option option, int value)
>  {
>  	struct vchiq_service *service = find_service_by_handle(handle);
> -	enum vchiq_status status = VCHIQ_ERROR;
>  	struct vchiq_service_quota *quota;
> +	int ret = -EIO;

Due to the nature of the driver it's hard to make a clear distinction, but is
-EIO really the best error for the function? I don't see error paths that
really depend on communication with VC4. I see it more aligned with -EINVAL.

Regards,
Nicolas





[Index of Archives]     [Linux Driver Development]     [Linux Driver Backports]     [DMA Engine]     [Linux GPIO]     [Linux SPI]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Coverity]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [Yosemite Backpacking]
  Powered by Linux