On Tue, Apr 20, 2021 at 10:43:53PM +0530, Deepak R Varma wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 20, 2021 at 10:35:23AM +0200, Fabio Aiuto wrote:
> > Hi Deepak,
> >
> > On Tue, Apr 20, 2021 at 12:46:40AM +0530, Deepak R Varma wrote:
> > > printk() without KERN_<LEVEL> facility is flagged by checkpatch as a
> > > warning. It is better to use pr_info() which comes with an
> > > inbuilt KERN_INFO level.
> > >
> > > Signed-off-by: Deepak R Varma <drv@xxxxxxxxx>
> > > ---
> > > drivers/staging/media/atomisp/i2c/atomisp-gc0310.c | 2 +-
> > > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> > >
> > > diff --git a/drivers/staging/media/atomisp/i2c/atomisp-gc0310.c b/drivers/staging/media/atomisp/i2c/atomisp-gc0310.c
> > > index b572551f1a0d..a0f3c5c32f94 100644
> > > --- a/drivers/staging/media/atomisp/i2c/atomisp-gc0310.c
> > > +++ b/drivers/staging/media/atomisp/i2c/atomisp-gc0310.c
> > > @@ -1020,7 +1020,7 @@ static int gc0310_set_fmt(struct v4l2_subdev *sd,
> > > return -EINVAL;
> > > }
> > >
> > > - printk("%s: before gc0310_write_reg_array %s\n", __func__,
> > > + pr_info("%s: before gc0310_write_reg_array %s\n", __func__,
> > > gc0310_res[dev->fmt_idx].desc);
> >
> > in a driver is best recommended to replace a raw printk call
> > with a dev_*() log. Check few lines above here to see
> > how it is done.
>
> Hello Fabio,
> thank you for the feedback. Should I resubmit this patch with additional
> printk() / pr_info() replacement by dev_*()? OR send in a new patch with
> this change? Just want to make sure I am not including more than one
> change type in the patch.
>
> deepak.
>
Hi Deepak,
what I would do is to just resend this patch with replacement by dev_*(),
which is just one change. Then if you want to replace all other
raw printk/pr_*() occurrences is matter of another separate
patch/series.
> >
> >
> > > ret = startup(sd);
> > > if (ret) {
> > > --
> > > 2.25.1
> > >
> > >
> >
> >
> > thank you,
> >
> > fabio
thank you,
fabio
