On Tuesday, April 13, 2021 9:48:44 PM CEST Matthew Wilcox wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 13, 2021 at 09:45:03PM +0200, Fabio M. De Francesco wrote:
> > 1) The driver doesn't call that function from anywhere else than the
> > macro. 2) You have explained that the macro add its symbol to a slot
> > in an array that would shift all the subsequent elements down if that
> > macro is not used exactly in the line where it is.
> > 3) Dan Carpenter said that that array is full of null functions (or
> > empty slots?).
> >
> > Unless that function is called anonymously dereferencing its address
> > from the position it occupies in the array, I'm not able to see what
> > else means can any caller use.
> >
> > I know I have much less experience than you with C: what can go wrong?
>
> Here's where the driver calls that function:
>
> $ git grep wlancmds drivers/staging/rtl8723bs/
> drivers/staging/rtl8723bs/core/rtw_cmd.c:static struct cmd_hdl wlancmds[]
> = { drivers/staging/rtl8723bs/core/rtw_cmd.c: if
> (pcmd->cmdcode < ARRAY_SIZE(wlancmds)) {
> drivers/staging/rtl8723bs/core/rtw_cmd.c: cmd_hdl
> = wlancmds[pcmd->cmdcode].h2cfuns;
>
OK, I had imagined an anonymous call from its location in the array (as I
wrote in the last phrase of my message). However, I thought that it could
have been an improbable possibility, not a real one.
Linux uses a lot of interesting ideas that newcomers like me should learn.
Things here are trickier than they appear at first sight.
Thanks,
Fabio
