On Sunday, April 11, 2021 11:26:41 AM CEST Julia Lawall wrote:
> On Sun, 11 Apr 2021, Fabio M. De Francesco wrote:
> > Change a controlling expression within an 'if' statement: don't compare
> > with 'true'.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Fabio M. De Francesco <fmdefrancesco@xxxxxxxxx>
> > ---
> >
> > Changes from v2: Rewrite subject in patch 0/4; remove a patch from the
> > series because it had already been applied (rtl8723bs: core: Remove an
> > unused variable). Changes from v1: Fix a typo in subject of patch 1/5,
> > add patch 5/5.>
> > drivers/staging/rtl8723bs/core/rtw_cmd.c | 2 +-
> > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/staging/rtl8723bs/core/rtw_cmd.c
> > b/drivers/staging/rtl8723bs/core/rtw_cmd.c index
> > 32079e0f71d5..600366cb1aeb 100644
> > --- a/drivers/staging/rtl8723bs/core/rtw_cmd.c
> > +++ b/drivers/staging/rtl8723bs/core/rtw_cmd.c
> > @@ -1507,7 +1507,7 @@ static void rtw_lps_change_dtim_hdl(struct
> > adapter *padapter, u8 dtim)>
> > if (pwrpriv->dtim != dtim)
> >
> > pwrpriv->dtim = dtim;
> >
> > - if ((pwrpriv->fw_current_in_ps_mode == true) && (pwrpriv-
>pwr_mode >
> > PS_MODE_ACTIVE)) { + if ((pwrpriv->fw_current_in_ps_mode) &&
> > (pwrpriv->pwr_mode > PS_MODE_ACTIVE)) {
> The parentheses in the left argument of && can be dropped as well.
>
What about the parentheses of the right argument? I'm not sure: does '>'
have precedence over '&&'? Doesn't it?
Thanks,
Fabio
>
> julia
>
> > u8 ps_mode = pwrpriv->pwr_mode;
> >
> > rtw_hal_set_hwreg(padapter, HW_VAR_H2C_FW_PWRMODE,
(u8
> > *)(&ps_mode));
> >
> > --
> > 2.31.1
> >
> > --
> > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
> > Groups "outreachy-kernel" group. To unsubscribe from this group and
> > stop receiving emails from it, send an email to
> > outreachy-kernel+unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx. To view this discussion
> > on the web visit
> > https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/outreachy-kernel/20210411082908.3187
> > 6-5-fmdefrancesco%40gmail.com.
