Re: [Outreachy kernel] [PATCH 2/2] media: zoran: replace bit shifts by BIT() macro

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Fri, Apr 09, 2021 at 12:10:06AM +0200, Julia Lawall wrote:
> 
> 
> On Fri, 9 Apr 2021, Mitali Borkar wrote:
> 
> > On Thu, Apr 08, 2021 at 11:15:07PM +0200, Julia Lawall wrote:
> > >
> > >
> > > On Fri, 9 Apr 2021, Mitali Borkar wrote:
> > >
> > > > Added #include <linux/bitops.h> and replaced bit shifts by BIT() macro.
> > > > This BIT() macro from linux/bitops.h is used to define ZR36057_VFESPFR_* bitmasks.
> > > > Use of macro is better and neater. It maintains consistency.
> > > > Reported by checkpatch.
> > > >
> > > > Signed-off-by: Mitali Borkar <mitaliborkar810@xxxxxxxxx>
> > > > ---
> > > >  drivers/staging/media/zoran/zr36057.h | 10 ++++++----
> > > >  1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
> > > >
> > > > diff --git a/drivers/staging/media/zoran/zr36057.h b/drivers/staging/media/zoran/zr36057.h
> > > > index a2a75fd9f535..93075459f910 100644
> > > > --- a/drivers/staging/media/zoran/zr36057.h
> > > > +++ b/drivers/staging/media/zoran/zr36057.h
> > > > @@ -8,6 +8,8 @@
> > > >  #ifndef _ZR36057_H_
> > > >  #define _ZR36057_H_
> > > >
> > > > +#include <linux/bitops.h>
> > > > +
> > > >  /* Zoran ZR36057 registers */
> > > >
> > > >  #define ZR36057_VFEHCR          0x000	/* Video Front End, Horizontal Configuration Register */
> > > > @@ -31,12 +33,12 @@
> > > >  #define ZR36057_VFESPFR_VER_DCM          8
> > > >  #define ZR36057_VFESPFR_DISP_MODE        6
> > > >  #define ZR36057_VFESPFR_YUV422          (0 << 3)
> > > > -#define ZR36057_VFESPFR_RGB888          (1 << 3)
> > > > +#define ZR36057_VFESPFR_RGB888          BIT(3)
> > >
> > > Uniformity is generally considered to be more important than using BIT.
> > > Having only a few constants defined using BIT is a bit strange.
> > >
> > Okay Ma'am. Can you please tell me on how to proceed now? I am not sure
> > how to proceed.
> 
> I think that this code should just be left as is.
> 
> Checkpatch makes suggestions.  Its suggestions are not always appropriate
> for the context.
>
Okay Ma'am. This means I should not do any changes now. Do I need to do
something in this patch now? Or move onto next one?

> julia
> 
> >
> > > julia
> > >
> > > >  #define ZR36057_VFESPFR_RGB565          (2 << 3)
> > > >  #define ZR36057_VFESPFR_RGB555          (3 << 3)
> > > > -#define ZR36057_VFESPFR_ERR_DIF          (1 << 2)
> > > > -#define ZR36057_VFESPFR_PACK24          (1 << 1)
> > > > -#define ZR36057_VFESPFR_LITTLE_ENDIAN    (1 << 0)
> > > > +#define ZR36057_VFESPFR_ERR_DIF          BIT(2)
> > > > +#define ZR36057_VFESPFR_PACK24          BIT(1)
> > > > +#define ZR36057_VFESPFR_LITTLE_ENDIAN    BIT(0)
> > > >
> > > >  #define ZR36057_VDTR            0x00c	/* Video Display "Top" Register */
> > > >
> > > > --
> > > > 2.30.2
> > > >
> > > > --
> > > > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "outreachy-kernel" group.
> > > > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to outreachy-kernel+unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx.
> > > > To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/outreachy-kernel/ac8ec2b70ac2cc7c541c05a1d9a8db1fe79df793.1617912177.git.mitaliborkar810%40gmail.com.
> > > >
> >




[Index of Archives]     [Linux Driver Development]     [Linux Driver Backports]     [DMA Engine]     [Linux GPIO]     [Linux SPI]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Coverity]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [Yosemite Backpacking]
  Powered by Linux