Fix checkpatch.pl errors such as:
ERROR: Macros with complex values should be enclosed in parentheses
+#define I1(x1) \
+ (int[]){ \
+ x1, 0 \
+ }
Also, wrap that `x1` in parentheses.
Cc: Spencer E. Olson <olsonse@xxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Ian Abbott <abbotti@xxxxxxxxx>
---
.../comedi/drivers/tests/ni_routes_test.c | 18 +++++++++---------
1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/staging/comedi/drivers/tests/ni_routes_test.c b/drivers/staging/comedi/drivers/tests/ni_routes_test.c
index 68defeb53de4..696e610f1822 100644
--- a/drivers/staging/comedi/drivers/tests/ni_routes_test.c
+++ b/drivers/staging/comedi/drivers/tests/ni_routes_test.c
@@ -63,24 +63,24 @@ static const int no_val_dest = O(7), no_val_index = 4;
/* I1 and I2 should not call O(...). Mostly here to shut checkpatch.pl up */
#define I1(x1) \
- (int[]){ \
- x1, 0 \
- }
+ ((int[]){ \
+ (x1), 0 \
+ })
#define I2(x1, x2) \
- (int[]){ \
+ ((int[]){ \
(x1), (x2), 0 \
- }
+ })
#define I3(x1, x2, x3) \
- (int[]){ \
+ ((int[]){ \
(x1), (x2), (x3), 0 \
- }
+ })
/* O9 is build to call O(...) for each arg */
#define O9(x1, x2, x3, x4, x5, x6, x7, x8, x9) \
- (int[]){ \
+ ((int[]){ \
O(x1), O(x2), O(x3), O(x4), O(x5), O(x6), O(x7), O(x8), O(x9), \
0 \
- }
+ })
static struct ni_device_routes DR = {
.device = "testdev",
--
2.31.0
