On Sat, Apr 03, 2021 at 10:40:08PM -0700, Deborah Brouwer wrote: > To conform with Linux kernel coding style, replace goto statement that > does no cleanup with a direct return. To preserve meaning, copy comments > from the original goto statement to the return statement. Identified by > the checkpatch warning: WARNING: void function return statements are not > generally useful. > > Signed-off-by: Deborah Brouwer <deborahbrouwer3563@xxxxxxxxx> > --- > drivers/staging/rtl8188eu/hal/rtl8188e_dm.c | 6 +++--- > 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/drivers/staging/rtl8188eu/hal/rtl8188e_dm.c b/drivers/staging/rtl8188eu/hal/rtl8188e_dm.c > index 391c59490718..d21f21857c20 100644 > --- a/drivers/staging/rtl8188eu/hal/rtl8188e_dm.c > +++ b/drivers/staging/rtl8188eu/hal/rtl8188e_dm.c > @@ -139,7 +139,9 @@ void rtw_hal_dm_watchdog(struct adapter *Adapter) > hw_init_completed = Adapter->hw_init_completed; > > if (!hw_init_completed) > - goto skip_dm; > + /* Check GPIO to determine current RF on/off and Pbc status. */ > + /* Check Hardware Radio ON/OFF or not */ > + return; It does not make sense to have the comments in two places here. The original code is just fine, there's nothing wrong with the goto statement here. thanks, greg k-h
