On Fri, Apr 02, 2021 at 12:01:21PM +0200, Fabio Aiuto wrote:
> @@ -568,20 +561,11 @@ static s32 update_attrib_sec_info(struct adapter *padapter, struct pkt_attrib *p
> if (pattrib->encrypt > 0)
> memcpy(pattrib->dot118021x_UncstKey.skey, psta->dot118021x_UncstKey.skey, 16);
>
> - RT_TRACE(_module_rtl871x_xmit_c_, _drv_info_,
> - ("update_attrib: encrypt =%d securitypriv.sw_encrypt =%d\n",
> - pattrib->encrypt, padapter->securitypriv.sw_encrypt));
> -
> if (pattrib->encrypt &&
> - ((padapter->securitypriv.sw_encrypt == true) || (psecuritypriv->hw_decrypted == false))) {
> + ((padapter->securitypriv.sw_encrypt) || (!psecuritypriv->hw_decrypted)))
You've done too much clean up here. Just remove the { but leave the
== true/false comparisons.
If the patch is only changing five lines or code then fixing checkpatch
warnings on the line of code you are changing is fine, but in this case
you're doing a bunch of changes and these sort of cleanups make it hard
to review.
Ease to spot that the curly brace changed:
- ((padapter->securitypriv.sw_encrypt == true) || (psecuritypriv->hw_decrypted == false))) {
+ ((padapter->securitypriv.sw_encrypt == true) || (psecuritypriv->hw_decrypted == false)))
Hard to spot:
- ((padapter->securitypriv.sw_encrypt == true) || (psecuritypriv->hw_decrypted == false))) {
+ ((padapter->securitypriv.sw_encrypt) || (!psecuritypriv->hw_decrypted)))
regards,
dan carpenter
