On Thu, Mar 25, 2021 at 04:30:41PM +0800, Xu Jia wrote: > Function rtw_init_bcmc_stainfo() is always return success. > Variable 'ret' set but not used. > > Reported-by: Hulk Robot <hulkci@xxxxxxxxxx> > Signed-off-by: Xu Jia <xujia39@xxxxxxxxxx> > --- > drivers/staging/rtl8723bs/core/rtw_sta_mgt.c | 2 +- > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) > > diff --git a/drivers/staging/rtl8723bs/core/rtw_sta_mgt.c b/drivers/staging/rtl8723bs/core/rtw_sta_mgt.c > index f96dd0b40e04..7b578192adf5 100644 > --- a/drivers/staging/rtl8723bs/core/rtw_sta_mgt.c > +++ b/drivers/staging/rtl8723bs/core/rtw_sta_mgt.c > @@ -551,7 +551,7 @@ u32 rtw_init_bcmc_stainfo(struct adapter *padapter) > psta->mac_id = 1; > > exit: > - return _SUCCESS; > + return res; > } You just changed the logic of this function, now it can return a failure. Is that ok? have you tested it when this fails? Given that I do not think anyone actually tests this value, should this function just return void instead? thanks, greg k-h
