On Fri, Mar 26, 2021 at 10:09:09AM +0100, Fabio Aiuto wrote: > fix the following checkpatch warning: > > ERROR: Macros with complex values should be enclosed in parentheses > 152: FILE: drivers/staging/rtl8723bs/hal/HalBtcOutSrc.h:152: > +#define BTC_PRINT(dbgtype, dbgflag, printstr) \ > no_printk printstr > -- > ERROR: Macros with complex values should be enclosed in parentheses > 153: FILE: drivers/staging/rtl8723bs/hal/HalBtcOutSrc.h:153: > +#define BTC_PRINT_F(dbgtype, dbgflag, printstr) \ > no_printk printstr > -- > ERROR: Macros with complex values should be enclosed in parentheses > 154: FILE: drivers/staging/rtl8723bs/hal/HalBtcOutSrc.h:154: > +#define BTC_PRINT_ADDR(dbgtype, dbgflag, printstr, _Ptr) \ > no_printk printstr > > Signed-off-by: Fabio Aiuto <fabioaiuto83@xxxxxxxxx> > --- > drivers/staging/rtl8723bs/hal/HalBtcOutSrc.h | 6 +++--- > 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/drivers/staging/rtl8723bs/hal/HalBtcOutSrc.h b/drivers/staging/rtl8723bs/hal/HalBtcOutSrc.h > index 10c021024b24..1926a1f7a7e5 100644 > --- a/drivers/staging/rtl8723bs/hal/HalBtcOutSrc.h > +++ b/drivers/staging/rtl8723bs/hal/HalBtcOutSrc.h > @@ -149,9 +149,9 @@ extern u32 GLBtcDbgType[]; > } > > #else > -#define BTC_PRINT(dbgtype, dbgflag, printstr) no_printk printstr > -#define BTC_PRINT_F(dbgtype, dbgflag, printstr) no_printk printstr > -#define BTC_PRINT_ADDR(dbgtype, dbgflag, printstr, _Ptr) no_printk printstr > +#define BTC_PRINT(dbgtype, dbgflag, printstr) (no_printk printstr) > +#define BTC_PRINT_F(dbgtype, dbgflag, printstr) (no_printk printstr) > +#define BTC_PRINT_ADDR(dbgtype, dbgflag, printstr, _Ptr) (no_printk printstr) This makes no sense at all. no_printk is a function. The BTC_PRINT() macros are super ugly and this only makes it worse. regards, dan carpenter