On Thu, Mar 13, 2025 at 02:12:29PM +0000, Mark Brown wrote: > On Thu, Mar 13, 2025 at 04:01:49PM +0200, Andy Shevchenko wrote: > > On Thu, Mar 13, 2025 at 12:47:32PM +0000, Mark Brown wrote: > > > > This doesn't apply against current code, please check and resend. > > > Hmm... It's based on the spi/for-next. Should I use another branch? > > I did try to apply it against that in case there were fixes that needed > merging up, it didn't apply. Are you sure you're using an up to date > copy? I have ebd50ac3cd97ecae231f92b2d64b68d3c66b3474. 87a228960033 spi: Use inclusive language 0d9a21198453 defconfig: enable SERIAL_MULTI_INSTANTIATE 90485ebfb4b3 defconfig: enable SPI_TOPCLIFF_PCH 6d91e1fce386 defconfig: enable EEPROM_AT24 and EEPROM_AT25 331ffc354c53 defconfig: enable GPIO_PCH d519315d6bed Merge remote-tracking branch 'spi/for-next' into HEAD ebd50ac3cd97 (spi/for-next) Merge remote-tracking branch 'spi/for-6.15' into spi-next Yes, the base where it was merged to is eds-acpi branch of my public GH [1], which has no SPI stuff in there. [1]: https://github.com/andy-shev/linux/commits/eds-acpi/ -- With Best Regards, Andy Shevchenko