On Wed, Nov 27, 2024 at 05:24:01PM +0000, Jon Hunter wrote: > On 27/11/2024 16:09, Mark Brown wrote: > > I understand what he's trying to accomplish, it's the same thing as > > what everyone who wants to put a raw spidev compatible in their DT is > > trying to do. The way to do this would be something like a DT overlay > > that describes whatever is actually connected, or just customise the DT > > locally. > We could certainly use an overlay, but how do we handle the kernel side? My > understanding is that per patch 3/3 we need to reference a compatible string > the kernel is aware of. I guess we could use an existing one, but feels like > a massive hack. It would be nice if there is something generic we can use > for this like 'linux,spidev'. > I see that ACPI has something and it does print a warning that this should > not be used in production systems. You can put 'spidev' in as the compatible and get the warning, we don't require specific compatibles if the Linux device ID is good enough. If you genuinely just have bare wires you're probably able to cope with the warning. If something is actually connected you should use the compatible for whatever that is, if spidev makes sense for it then that'd be OK to add to spidev.
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
