Re: [PATCH v4 1/3] dt-bindings: spi: Add realtek,rtl9301-snand

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Mon, Oct 14, 2024 at 02:52:43PM +1300, Chris Packham wrote:
 
> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/spi/realtek,rtl9301-snand.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/spi/realtek,rtl9301-snand.yaml
> new file mode 100644
> index 000000000000..397b32b41e86
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/spi/realtek,rtl9301-snand.yaml
> @@ -0,0 +1,59 @@
> +# SPDX-License-Identifier: (GPL-2.0-only OR BSD-2-Clause)
> +%YAML 1.2
> +---
> +$id: http://devicetree.org/schemas/spi/realtek,rtl9301-snand.yaml#
> +$schema: http://devicetree.org/meta-schemas/core.yaml#
> +
> +title: SPI-NAND Flash Controller for Realtek RTL9300 SoCs
> +
> +maintainers:
> +  - Chris Packham <chris.packham@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> +
> +description:
> +  The Realtek RTL9300 SoCs have a built in SPI-NAND controller. It supports
> +  typical SPI-NAND page cache operations in single, dual or quad IO mode.
> +
> +properties:
> +  compatible:
> +    enum:
> +      - realtek,rtl9301-snand
> +      - realtek,rtl9302b-snand
> +      - realtek,rtl9302c-snand
> +      - realtek,rtl9303-snand

All of them look compatible with each other, why not using fallback to
9301? That's common and expected pattern.

Best regards,
Krzysztof





[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux ARM (vger)]     [Linux ARM MSM]     [Linux Omap]     [Linux Arm]     [Linux Tegra]     [Fedora ARM]     [Linux for Samsung SOC]     [eCos]     [Linux Fastboot]     [Gcc Help]     [Git]     [DCCP]     [IETF Announce]     [Security]     [Linux MIPS]     [Yosemite Campsites]

  Powered by Linux