Hi, i noticed that scripts/get_maintainer.pl for changes on spi-fsl-lpspi just provide addresses for the SPI subsystem. But my expectation would also be linux-arm-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx / imx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx in order to give the platform people a chance for review. Is there a plan from the NXP people to step up as maintainer or should it be added to the IMX architecture? Best regards
Maintainer for spi-fsl-lpspi
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
- Subject: Maintainer for spi-fsl-lpspi
- From: Stefan Wahren <wahrenst@xxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 5 Sep 2024 08:34:42 +0200
- Cc: linux-spi@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, "imx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx" <imx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Pengutronix Kernel Team <kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Ui-outboundreport: notjunk:1;M01:P0:jqRxZcFkjDU=;rAuEj18lGs7vLgHU5Cts2HLV6OU 9LKknYqKmIFG8Hh2//MxKGcvacP84DBBWYr5LbzJ+y4L9LEgaEsuLRjnzYBP3ULfoim0Wa8oK i1TSQrGSwMrUarp1vx9wbzctq8PRKSU1CieCui0E71QgEADy0WaDjH+5wUiWZUdVrKW94FyQI vA/ND67nUqatxBvP1LkBHlX4o7xZl6CeJAtwjaGbZCAyqe7VW1Trj5cpENcokO2wBYQvb77Oz K31yXKgipckMkpbXp402DGtu8KA9LjJuXwq5wGHdu02kmYoBut/5qtbhHVlkSYC1qKcbBJo1i CMHFCeaoBRSHqoxIxoQ7s4D0JvRdyZJyKa+6V0Wwp25CA5IWx8bBb8063ISP4yEZH8AfRMCam myyn+9eI2yxQq7lcUC1GiDv6rNGLoWHqQxZuZjOOXQyTe9uUIpEZ6pFQSoFTGhCpeiriBdiQY LM/dcFmGusfgyzmQflqBodXT2ft9xWGdzuQHXG9gSOlxaoZxEV9g092qx0tIGOcPkpQy/+aEL ycyj6HNSxDDu4FW55/3TzaSO6iyYaL0A+LeFGAU0jmzzGf61UGd2QPDGSs3ld5hB35BdeFewQ UrKFAjF2I8jJ+5vlDdE74T6bU118N4113fT2GK0uMBsod6VcP3rTlAOdSp0HsgcGDNuZfgYMO 18tidOK1jhuUJvA06E4VvgyfauhNUeTjAF0/2kkepbXxca7dSybXL/MRxyNwBBjeRz+6LllXm 5L/sOo7fPNfjkhM/z4V4pi0LVQnIfMRMxhQvSBCBQqvmI27yaNi6WKwoJ7c+/TqdkeVkgUl8g 9d/IiLp9xzGTSt1UcXc7TRlA==
- User-agent: Mozilla Thunderbird
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Maintainer for spi-fsl-lpspi
- From: Frank Li
- Re: Maintainer for spi-fsl-lpspi
- Prev by Date: RE: [PATCH v2 3/3] arm64: dts: imx8ulp: correct the flexspi compatible string
- Next by Date: Re: [PATCH v2 1/3] dt-bindings: spi: nxp-fspi: add imx8ulp support
- Previous by thread: [PATCH v2 0/3] fix the flexspi error on imx8ulp
- Next by thread: Re: Maintainer for spi-fsl-lpspi
- Index(es):
 |