Re: [PATCH 11/22] pinctrl: qcom: sa8775p: Add support for SA8255p SoC
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
- Subject: Re: [PATCH 11/22] pinctrl: qcom: sa8775p: Add support for SA8255p SoC
- From: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 30 Aug 2024 11:52:04 +0200
- Cc: andersson@xxxxxxxxxx, konradybcio@xxxxxxxxxx, robh@xxxxxxxxxx, krzk+dt@xxxxxxxxxx, conor+dt@xxxxxxxxxx, rafael@xxxxxxxxxx, viresh.kumar@xxxxxxxxxx, herbert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, davem@xxxxxxxxxxxxx, sudeep.holla@xxxxxxx, andi.shyti@xxxxxxxxxx, tglx@xxxxxxxxxxxxx, will@xxxxxxxxxx, joro@xxxxxxxxxx, jassisinghbrar@xxxxxxxxx, lee@xxxxxxxxxx, linus.walleij@xxxxxxxxxx, amitk@xxxxxxxxxx, thara.gopinath@xxxxxxxxx, broonie@xxxxxxxxxx, wim@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, linux@xxxxxxxxxxxx, robin.murphy@xxxxxxx, cristian.marussi@xxxxxxx, rui.zhang@xxxxxxxxx, lukasz.luba@xxxxxxx, vkoul@xxxxxxxxxx, quic_gurus@xxxxxxxxxxx, agross@xxxxxxxxxx, bartosz.golaszewski@xxxxxxxxxx, quic_rjendra@xxxxxxxxxxx, robimarko@xxxxxxxxx, linux-arm-msm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, devicetree@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, linux-pm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, linux-crypto@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, arm-scmi@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, linux-arm-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, linux-i2c@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, iommu@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, linux-gpio@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, linux-serial@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, linux-spi@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, linux-watchdog@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, kernel@xxxxxxxxxxx, quic_psodagud@xxxxxxxxxxx, quic_tsoni@xxxxxxxxxxx, quic_shazhuss@xxxxxxxxxxx
- In-reply-to: <d15927f9-bd00-4e32-9c25-535c69fe56f6@quicinc.com>
- References: <20240828203721.2751904-1-quic_nkela@quicinc.com> <20240828203721.2751904-12-quic_nkela@quicinc.com> <erlzqkxrogk24ugfahfsxrramay6tfhljnxrcfcuhe24pla7k3@lytnz3kmszyj> <d15927f9-bd00-4e32-9c25-535c69fe56f6@quicinc.com>
- User-agent: Mozilla Thunderbird
On 29/08/2024 16:17, Nikunj Kela wrote:
>
> On 8/29/2024 12:29 AM, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
>> On Wed, Aug 28, 2024 at 01:37:10PM -0700, Nikunj Kela wrote:
>>> SA8255p platform uses the same TLMM block as used in SA8775p,
>>> though the pins are split between Firmware VM and Linux VM.
>>> let's add SA8255p specific compatible.
>> The change suggests devices are fully compatible, but above description
>> does not.
>>
>> This looks conflicting.
>>
>> Best regards,
>> Krzysztof
>
> Hi Krzysztof,
>
> Thanks for reviewing patches. TLMM HW block is exactly same as used in
> SA8775p however ownership of pins can be split between firmware VM and
> Linux VM. It is upto devices to decide what pins they want to use in
> what VM. I will extend the subject with same description as used in DT
> binding.
So there is no difference? Then devices should be made compatible with
fallback.
Best regards,
Krzysztof
[Index of Archives]
[Linux Kernel]
[Linux ARM (vger)]
[Linux ARM MSM]
[Linux Omap]
[Linux Arm]
[Linux Tegra]
[Fedora ARM]
[Linux for Samsung SOC]
[eCos]
[Linux Fastboot]
[Gcc Help]
[Git]
[DCCP]
[IETF Announce]
[Security]
[Linux MIPS]
[Yosemite Campsites]
|