On Fri, Jun 28, 2024 at 12:53:38AM +0300, Vladimir Oltean wrote: > and FWIW, I noticed this as well, but didn't want to put yet another > roadblock in the conversion of a binding which was way overdue. > I was planning to send a patch as well, once the binding was merged. If I've seen a report that a new binding introduces errors then I'm very unlikely to apply it, I'd guess that's true for other maintainers too - it's probably best to fix reported errors promptly by default.
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
