Re: [PATCH 1/2] spi: spi-imx: Switch to RUNTIME_PM_OPS/SYSTEM_SLEEP_PM_OPS()

[Mark Brown <broonie@xxxxxxxxxx>]

On Mon, 24 Jun 2024 21:20:22 -0300, Fabio Estevam wrote:
> Replace SET_RUNTIME_PM_OPS()/SET SYSTEM_SLEEP_PM_OPS() with their modern
> RUNTIME_PM_OPS() and SYSTEM_SLEEP_PM_OPS() alternatives.
> 
> The combined usage of pm_ptr() and RUNTIME_PM_OPS/SYSTEM_SLEEP_PM_OPS()
> allows the compiler to evaluate if the runtime suspend/resume() functions
> are used at build time or are simply dead code.
> 
> [...]

Applied to

   https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/broonie/spi.git for-next

Thanks!

[1/2] spi: spi-imx: Switch to RUNTIME_PM_OPS/SYSTEM_SLEEP_PM_OPS()
      commit: a93f089ccf823dcb9cf678969e127047762a1473
[2/2] spi: spi-fsl-lpspi: Switch to SYSTEM_SLEEP_PM_OPS()
      commit: 6765e859fac9acdc1265b6f16ed33f42317ed30e

All being well this means that it will be integrated into the linux-next
tree (usually sometime in the next 24 hours) and sent to Linus during
the next merge window (or sooner if it is a bug fix), however if
problems are discovered then the patch may be dropped or reverted.

You may get further e-mails resulting from automated or manual testing
and review of the tree, please engage with people reporting problems and
send followup patches addressing any issues that are reported if needed.

If any updates are required or you are submitting further changes they
should be sent as incremental updates against current git, existing
patches will not be replaced.

Please add any relevant lists and maintainers to the CCs when replying
to this mail.

Thanks,
Mark