On Mon, 17 Jun 2024 12:36:34 +0300 Nikita Shubin via B4 Relay wrote: > The goal is to recieve ACKs for all patches in series to merge it via Arnd branch. Why? The usual process is for every subsystem to accept the relevant patches, and then they converge during the merge window.
Re: [PATCH v10 00/38] ep93xx device tree conversion
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
- Subject: Re: [PATCH v10 00/38] ep93xx device tree conversion
- From: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 18 Jun 2024 07:33:39 -0700
- Cc: nikita.shubin@xxxxxxxxxxx, Arnd Bergmann <arnd@xxxxxxxx>, Hartley Sweeten <hsweeten@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Alexander Sverdlin <alexander.sverdlin@xxxxxxxxx>, Russell King <linux@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Lukasz Majewski <lukma@xxxxxxx>, Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@xxxxxxxxxx>, Bartosz Golaszewski <brgl@xxxxxxxx>, Andy Shevchenko <andy@xxxxxxxxxx>, Michael Turquette <mturquette@xxxxxxxxxxxx>, Stephen Boyd <sboyd@xxxxxxxxxx>, Sebastian Reichel <sre@xxxxxxxxxx>, Rob Herring <robh+dt@xxxxxxxxxx>, Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@xxxxxxxxxx>, Conor Dooley <conor+dt@xxxxxxxxxx>, Vinod Koul <vkoul@xxxxxxxxxx>, Wim Van Sebroeck <wim@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Guenter Roeck <linux@xxxxxxxxxxxx>, Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@xxxxxxxxx>, Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Mark Brown <broonie@xxxxxxxxxx>, "David S. Miller" <davem@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Eric Dumazet <edumazet@xxxxxxxxxx>, Paolo Abeni <pabeni@xxxxxxxxxx>, Miquel Raynal <miquel.raynal@xxxxxxxxxxx>, Richard Weinberger <richard@xxxxxx>, Vignesh Raghavendra <vigneshr@xxxxxx>, Damien Le Moal <dlemoal@xxxxxxxxxx>, Sergey Shtylyov <s.shtylyov@xxxxxx>, Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@xxxxxxxxx>, Liam Girdwood <lgirdwood@xxxxxxxxx>, Jaroslav Kysela <perex@xxxxxxxx>, Takashi Iwai <tiwai@xxxxxxxx>, Ralf Baechle <ralf@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, "Wu, Aaron" <Aaron.Wu@xxxxxxxxxx>, Lee Jones <lee@xxxxxxxxxx>, Olof Johansson <olof@xxxxxxxxx>, Niklas Cassel <cassel@xxxxxxxxxx>, linux-arm-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, linux-gpio@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, linux-clk@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, linux-pm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, devicetree@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, dmaengine@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, linux-watchdog@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, linux-pwm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, linux-spi@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, netdev@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, linux-mtd@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, linux-ide@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, linux-input@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, linux-sound@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, Bartosz Golaszewski <bartosz.golaszewski@xxxxxxxxxx>, Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@xxxxxxxxxx>, Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@xxxxxxxxx>, Andrew Lunn <andrew@xxxxxxx>
- In-reply-to: <20240617-ep93xx-v10-0-662e640ed811@maquefel.me>
- References: <20240617-ep93xx-v10-0-662e640ed811@maquefel.me>
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: [PATCH v10 00/38] ep93xx device tree conversion
- From: Nikita Shubin
- Re: [PATCH v10 00/38] ep93xx device tree conversion
- References:
- [PATCH v10 00/38] ep93xx device tree conversion
- From: Nikita Shubin via B4 Relay
- [PATCH v10 00/38] ep93xx device tree conversion
- Prev by Date: Re: [PATCH] spi: omap2-mcspi: consider gpiod chip selects.
- Next by Date: Re: [PATCH] spi: Increase imx51 ecspi burst length based on transfer length
- Previous by thread: Re: [PATCH v10 00/38] ep93xx device tree conversion
- Next by thread: Re: [PATCH v10 00/38] ep93xx device tree conversion
- Index(es):
 |