Hi > > > +static unsigned char reverse_bits(unsigned char num) { > > + unsigned int count = sizeof(num) * 8 - 1; > > + unsigned int reverse_num = num; > > + > > + num >>= 1; > > + while (num) { > > + reverse_num <<= 1; > > + reverse_num |= num & 1; > > + num >>= 1; > > + count--; > > + } > > + reverse_num <<= count; > > + return reverse_num; > > +} > > I can't help but think there ought to be a helper for this though I can't > think what it is off the top of my head. If there isn't it probably makes > sense to add this as one. It seems bitrev8 is doing what I want. > > > + /* Enable xfer state machine */ > > + if (!cdns_xspi->xfer_in_progress) { > > + u32 xfer_control = readl(cdns_xspi->xferbase + > > +MRVL_XFER_FUNC_CTRL); > > + > > + cdns_xspi->current_xfer_qword = 0; > > + cdns_xspi->xfer_in_progress = true; > > + xfer_control |= (MRVL_XFER_RECEIVE_ENABLE | > > + MRVL_XFER_CLK_CAPTURE_POL | > > + MRVL_XFER_FUNC_START | > > + MRVL_XFER_SOFT_RESET | > > + FIELD_PREP(MRVL_XFER_CS_N_HOLD, (1 << cs))); > > + xfer_control &= ~(MRVL_XFER_FUNC_ENABLE | > MRVL_XFER_CLK_DRIVE_POL); > > + writel(xfer_control, cdns_xspi->xferbase + > MRVL_XFER_FUNC_CTRL); > > + } > > Could this just be a prepare_transfer_hardware() and we could just use > transfer_one()? I have run some experiments, and it won't be possible. HW expects reset after completing whole transfer. With prepare_transfer_hardware() and unprepared_transfer_hardware(), that reset won't be guaranteed. Also, there will be a problem when CS line will be changed(without overlay reinit) Regards Witek