Re: [PATCH RFC v2 1/8] spi: dt-bindings: spi-peripheral-props: add spi-offloads property

[Nuno Sá <noname.nuno@xxxxxxxxx>]

On Thu, 2024-05-23 at 09:28 -0500, David Lechner wrote:
> On 5/22/24 1:24 PM, Conor Dooley wrote:
> > On Tue, May 21, 2024 at 09:54:39AM -0500, David Lechner wrote:
> > > On Sun, May 19, 2024 at 7:53 AM Conor Dooley <conor@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > > > 
> > > > On Fri, May 17, 2024 at 11:51:58AM -0500, David Lechner wrote:
> > > > > On Thu, May 16, 2024 at 4:32 PM Conor Dooley <conor@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > > > > > On Tue, May 14, 2024 at 05:56:47PM -0500, David Lechner wrote:
> > > > 
> 

...

> 
> controller:
> #spi-offload-cells = <2>: /* 1st cell = offload instance
>                            * 2nd cell = trigger provider */
> 

What about things like DMA? I'm mentioning it a lot because it's way more complex
having it on the controller (from a SW perspective). But from an HW point of view,
it's always very similar (if not the same) as your case A.

- Nuno Sá
>