Re: [PATCH v1 1/1] spi: pxa2xx: Move PXA SSP bindings to the correct folder

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Fri, May 17, 2024 at 03:19:51PM -0500, Rob Herring wrote:
> On Fri, May 17, 2024 at 2:58 PM Andy Shevchenko
> <andriy.shevchenko@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > On Fri, May 17, 2024 at 06:24:37PM +0100, Mark Brown wrote:
> > > On Fri, May 17, 2024 at 08:11:03PM +0300, Andy Shevchenko wrote:

...

> > > > SSP stands for Serial Synchronous Protocol and has nothing to do with
> > > > UART, also known as USART, where 'A' stands for Asynchronous.
> > > >
> > > > Move the SSP bindings to where it belongs.
> > >
> > > It's a serial device which is also used for other applications (the
> > > other one upstream being audio) so I can see where the current binding
> > > comes from and it's not super obvious that spi is especially better
> > > here.
> >
> > Hmm... okay. Then it's question to DT people. Consider this as a report.
> > Because UART (aka serial) is definitely not the place for SPI/SSP bindings
> > either.
> 
> Move it when it is converted.

The problem is that somebody added a binding (in YAML) for SPI PXA2xx
in the spi/ folder while this one kept unconverted.

If it dangles more, it might be that we will have two asynchronous bindings
for the co-existed drivers.

> Until then, I don't care too much. SPI seems better than serial at least.
> The sound part is its own binding/node (something we wouldn't do today).

-- 
With Best Regards,
Andy Shevchenko






[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux ARM (vger)]     [Linux ARM MSM]     [Linux Omap]     [Linux Arm]     [Linux Tegra]     [Fedora ARM]     [Linux for Samsung SOC]     [eCos]     [Linux Fastboot]     [Gcc Help]     [Git]     [DCCP]     [IETF Announce]     [Security]     [Linux MIPS]     [Yosemite Campsites]

  Powered by Linux