Re: [PATCH] spi: imx: Don't expect DMA for i.MX{25, 35, 50, 51, 53} cspi devices
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
- Subject: Re: [PATCH] spi: imx: Don't expect DMA for i.MX{25, 35, 50, 51, 53} cspi devices
- From: Martin Kaiser <martin@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sun, 12 May 2024 18:14:39 +0200
- Cc: imx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, Alexander Stein <alexander.stein@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Fabio Estevam <festevam@xxxxxxxxx>, Sascha Hauer <s.hauer@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, linux-spi@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, Mark Brown <broonie@xxxxxxxxxx>, Pengutronix Kernel Team <kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Francesco Dolcini <francesco.dolcini@xxxxxxxxxxx>, Shawn Guo <shawnguo@xxxxxxxxxx>, linux-arm-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- In-reply-to: <pof7t5skj6w7to75kynjtck5hh5whc2zm3k3cd3nsz6ogthxi3@2a6at3s4lfpy>
- References: <20240508095610.2146640-2-u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de> <ZjuB1Rjyu1ooYvDi@akranes.kaiser.cx> <a342h4qn2qkmeimbuanyqh6pxbpqvz7artmodnltcxtbzeo6qn@iyth4xit622f> <pof7t5skj6w7to75kynjtck5hh5whc2zm3k3cd3nsz6ogthxi3@2a6at3s4lfpy>
Hello,
Thus wrote Uwe Kleine-König (u.kleine-koenig@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx):
> Hello,
> On Fri, May 10, 2024 at 02:32:56PM +0200, Uwe Kleine-König wrote:
> > On Wed, May 08, 2024 at 03:44:53PM +0200, Martin Kaiser wrote:
> > > Thus wrote Uwe Kleine-König (u.kleine-koenig@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx):
> > > > While in commit 2dd33f9cec90 ("spi: imx: support DMA for imx35") it was
> > > > claimed that DMA works on i.MX25, i.MX31 and i.MX35 the respective
> > > > device trees don't add DMA channels. The Reference manuals of i.MX31 and
> > > > i.MX25 also don't mention the CSPI core being DMA capable. (I didn't
> > > > check the others.)
> > > If I'm not mistaken, the imx25 reference manual
> > > https://www.nxp.com/docs/en/reference-manual/IMX25RM.pdf
> > > does say that CSPI has DMA support. Section 18.1.1 (Features) lists DMA as one
> > > of the features. There's also DMA events (section 3) for CSPI-1/2/3 RX, TX.
> > Oh indeed. I don't know what made me claim that DMA isn't mentioned in
> > the reference manual. Maybe I looked at the i2c chapter.
> > I now did:
> > diff --git a/arch/arm/boot/dts/nxp/imx/imx25.dtsi b/arch/arm/boot/dts/nxp/imx/imx25.dtsi
> > index 4a85684deff8..710b28a41bae 100644
> > --- a/arch/arm/boot/dts/nxp/imx/imx25.dtsi
> > +++ b/arch/arm/boot/dts/nxp/imx/imx25.dtsi
> > @@ -190,6 +190,8 @@ spi1: spi@43fa4000 {
> > reg = <0x43fa4000 0x4000>;
> > clocks = <&clks 78>, <&clks 78>;
> > clock-names = "ipg", "per";
> > + dmas = <&sdma 8 1 0>, <&sdma 9 1 0>;
> > + dma-names = "rx", "tx";
> > interrupts = <14>;
> > status = "disabled";
> > };
> > @@ -229,6 +231,8 @@ spi3: spi@50004000 {
> > interrupts = <0>;
> > clocks = <&clks 80>, <&clks 80>;
> > clock-names = "ipg", "per";
> > + dmas = <&sdma 34 1 0>, <&sdma 35 1 0>;
> > + dma-names = "rx", "tx";
> > status = "disabled";
> > };
> > @@ -257,6 +261,8 @@ spi2: spi@50010000 {
> > reg = <0x50010000 0x4000>;
> > clocks = <&clks 79>, <&clks 79>;
> > clock-names = "ipg", "per";
> > + dmas = <&sdma 6 1 0>, <&sdma 7 1 0>;
> > + dma-names = "rx", "tx";
> > interrupts = <13>;
> > status = "disabled";
> > };
> Additionally to the above I now did:
> diff --git a/drivers/spi/spi-imx.c b/drivers/spi/spi-imx.c
> index c3e5cee18bea..74da1a965a0d 100644
> --- a/drivers/spi/spi-imx.c
> +++ b/drivers/spi/spi-imx.c
> @@ -1428,12 +1428,9 @@ static int spi_imx_dma_transfer(struct spi_imx_data *spi_imx,
> if (ret)
> goto dma_failure_no_start;
> - if (!spi_imx->devtype_data->setup_wml) {
> - dev_err(spi_imx->dev, "No setup_wml()?\n");
> - ret = -EINVAL;
> - goto dma_failure_no_start;
> + if (spi_imx->devtype_data->setup_wml) {
> + spi_imx->devtype_data->setup_wml(spi_imx);
> }
> - spi_imx->devtype_data->setup_wml(spi_imx);
> /*
> * The TX DMA setup starts the transfer, so make sure RX is configured
> because there is no .setup_wml() callback for i.MX25 in
> imx31_cspi_devtype_data and the DMA register is already setup in
> mx31_prepare_transfer(). Without this change DMA isn't used.
> However this breaks SPI transfers, when I try to read out an MRAM I get:
> root@ecu02:~ hexdump -C /dev/mtd4
> [ 71.813807] spi_imx 43fa4000.spi: I/O Error in DMA TX
> [ 71.819173] spi-nor spi0.2: SPI transfer failed: -110
> [ 71.829129] spi_master spi0: failed to transfer one message from queue
> [ 71.843962] spi_master spi0: noqueue transfer failed
> So it would indeed be interesting if you ever managed to use DMA on
> i.MX25.
I believe so. Looking into my notes from 2016 (when I last tried this), I got
the -110 error when the SMC bit in CONREG wasn't set. But this should now be
done in mx31_prepare_transfer if DMA is used...
I'll try to set up a test some time next week.
Best regards,
Martin
- References:
- [PATCH] spi: imx: Don't expect DMA for i.MX{25,35,50,51,53} cspi devices
- Re: [PATCH] spi: imx: Don't expect DMA for i.MX{25,35,50,51,53} cspi devices
- Re: [PATCH] spi: imx: Don't expect DMA for i.MX{25, 35, 50, 51, 53} cspi devices
- Re: [PATCH] spi: imx: Don't expect DMA for i.MX{25, 35, 50, 51, 53} cspi devices
[Index of Archives]
[Linux Kernel]
[Linux ARM (vger)]
[Linux ARM MSM]
[Linux Omap]
[Linux Arm]
[Linux Tegra]
[Fedora ARM]
[Linux for Samsung SOC]
[eCos]
[Linux Fastboot]
[Gcc Help]
[Git]
[DCCP]
[IETF Announce]
[Security]
[Linux MIPS]
[Yosemite Campsites]
|