Re: (subset) [PATCH v3 0/9] spi: cadence-qspi: add Mobileye EyeQ5 support

[Mark Brown <broonie@xxxxxxxxxx>]

On Wed, 10 Apr 2024 11:29:03 +0200, Théo Lebrun wrote:
> V3 of this series adding octal SPI-NOR support to Mobileye EyeQ5
> platform. It has been tested on EyeQ5 hardware successfully.
> V1 cover letter [5] contains a brief summary of what gets added.
> 
> There is no dependency except if you want zero errors in devicetree:
> system-controller series [3] for <&clocks> phandle.
> 
> [...]

Applied to

   https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/broonie/spi.git for-next

Thanks!

[1/9] spi: dt-bindings: cdns,qspi-nor: sort compatibles alphabetically
      commit: 002514d91fccde2adbe750c9ec5c6207d56c890b
[2/9] spi: dt-bindings: cdns,qspi-nor: add mobileye,eyeq5-ospi compatible
      commit: 52826aee484b3ebb6ed94c1ae89c0944110ed8b1
[3/9] spi: dt-bindings: cdns,qspi-nor: make cdns,fifo-depth optional
      commit: eb4fdb4bf46f875eac3c093f7ff43a223985f7b8
[4/9] spi: cadence-qspi: allow FIFO depth detection
      (no commit info)
[5/9] spi: cadence-qspi: add no-IRQ mode to indirect reads
      (no commit info)
[6/9] spi: cadence-qspi: add early busywait to cqspi_wait_for_bit()
      (no commit info)
[7/9] spi: cadence-qspi: add mobileye,eyeq5-ospi compatible
      (no commit info)

All being well this means that it will be integrated into the linux-next
tree (usually sometime in the next 24 hours) and sent to Linus during
the next merge window (or sooner if it is a bug fix), however if
problems are discovered then the patch may be dropped or reverted.

You may get further e-mails resulting from automated or manual testing
and review of the tree, please engage with people reporting problems and
send followup patches addressing any issues that are reported if needed.

If any updates are required or you are submitting further changes they
should be sent as incremental updates against current git, existing
patches will not be replaced.

Please add any relevant lists and maintainers to the CCs when replying
to this mail.

Thanks,
Mark